On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > + .long sys_mq_notify /* 275 */
> > + .long sys_mq_getsetattr
> > + .long sys_waitid
> > + .long sys_setaltroot
> > + .long sys_add_key
> > + .long sys_request_key /* 280 */
> > + .long sys_keyctl
>
> The syscall after sys_mq_getsetattr and before sys_waitid is reserved
> for kexec, is there some reason that this isn't being filled as a
> sys_ni_syscall for the time being instead?
I dropped it because there's no implementation for it on m68k anyway.
We can still add it when needed, right?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
