Re: `new' syscalls for m68k

On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP? Not really > - I disabled [sg]et_thread_area() since sys_[gs]et_thread_area() are > missing. Do we have to implement them, or should we use some other > method for Thread Local

`new' syscalls for m68k

I'm updating the syscall table for m68k... Below is a patch that adds all syscalls that m68k is currently lacking (compared to ia32). However, I'm wondering whether we need all of them: - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP? - I disabled [sg]et_thread_area() since sys_[gs]et_thr

status of cernlib on arm and m68k?

Hi all, It looks like cernlib has been building on the ARM buildd "netwinder" since 31 August, and the m68k buildd "kiivi" since 6 September. These seem like awfully long times; more typical build times are ~16 hours on ARM and ~35-50 hours on m68k. These two arches and bug # 255970 are the only