Re: Xf86 and fbdev, unresolved symbol

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Sarah wrote: I'm using fbdev. However X fails with the error: Symbol fbPictureInit from module /usr/XllR6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! I don't believe it's a config problem. I have not got an answer on this problem but I believe it to be a programming error

Fw: ail

I can't figure out why I can't find stuff like this on my own. http://www.inetcontact.com/ref44.html You can download movies, console games and stuff. I bookmarked about 9 pages of dvd movies I wanted. Already started downloading them. You should get a load of how many movies are in here that'

Xf86 and fbdev, unresolved symbol

Hey, I'm trying to get X working on my A4000 (btw the woody install went fine, turns out it was prob with CD drive). I'm using fbdev. However X fails with the error: Symbol fbPictureInit from module /usr/XllR6/lib/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.o is unresolved! I'm using X version 4.1.0.1, is this a

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

Stephen, Well, after changing out the 68LC040 for the 68040 I have gotten farther than ever before. I am into the partition process now, so that must have been it. I never would have thought of that. BTW, it is not really that I care about the 610 as much as I have more memory for it than for t

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

Stephen, Ah, well I definitely want the FPU! Tony On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:31:38PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote: > Stephen, > > Well, I have a Q700 with an 040 in it. I will swap them. > > What is special about the LC anyway? No FPU. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it ri

Re: qt-x11-free 3.3.3-3 needs build

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:38:16PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > As per Ingo's suggestion I am sending this email. Can someone build the > qt-x11-free 3.3.3-3 on a m68k 060 it takes a very long time on the 040's. Well, it takes a long time on 060, too: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>avg-pkg-build-time qt-x11-

Re: Re :Re: Kernel 2.6 for m68k/amiga

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Storm66 wrote: > > I will also try to download a "already made" kernel from > http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/kernel-image/ I just tried the 2.6.7 myself after my Amiga crashed while compiling xemacs21... the kernel seems to work fine (I have tr

qt-x11-free 3.3.3-3 needs build

As per Ingo's suggestion I am sending this email. Can someone build the qt-x11-free 3.3.3-3 on a m68k 060 it takes a very long time on the 040's. Thanks, Chris Cheney signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:31:38PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote: > Stephen, > > Well, I have a Q700 with an 040 in it. I will swap them. > > What is special about the LC anyway? No FPU. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Desc

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

Stephen, Well, I have a Q700 with an 040 in it. I will swap them. What is special about the LC anyway? Tony On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:54:09PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote: > It is the LC model chip. How do I tell if it needs the mac53c9x=1,0 It can't hurt to use the mac53c9x=1,0. The LC chip is a real

Re :Re: Kernel 2.6 for m68k/amiga

Le mar 17/08/2004 à 10:03, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit : > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Storm66 wrote: > > Is it possible to get a 2.6 kernel for m68k or the "general" kernel from > > debian is OK ? > > Please use the version from Linux/m68k CVS, cfr. http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/ > OK, I am uploading it

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

Tony Pitman wrote: Stephen, that is one of the weird things. I went back to mac os and deleted the partitions hoping that maybe the installer would rather create them itself. When i look at /proc/partitions now (after rebooting and getting the installer going again) it shows all the partitions i

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:54:09PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote: > It is the LC model chip. How do I tell if it needs the mac53c9x=1,0 It can't hurt to use the mac53c9x=1,0. The LC chip is a real problem, since linux doesn't currently run stably on it (as far as I know). Some attempts have been made

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

Stephen, It is the LC model chip. How do I tell if it needs the mac53c9x=1,0 Tony On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:15:55PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote: > Stephen, > > that is one of the weird things. I went back to mac os and deleted the > partitions hoping that maybe the installer would rather create them

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:15:55PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote: > Stephen, > > that is one of the weird things. I went back to mac os and deleted the > partitions hoping that maybe the installer would rather create them itself. > When i look at /proc/partitions now (after rebooting and getting the

Re: Bug#266369: kernel-image-2.4.26-mac crashes on 840av

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:43:36PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Package: kernel-image-2.4.26-mac > Version: 2.4.26-1 > > Hi, > booting this kernel on a Quadra 840av via MacOS 9.1 and penguin 19 > causes a crash right after initializing the Framebuffer. I know, do you have a patch? The linux-

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

Stephen, that is one of the weird things. I went back to mac os and deleted the partitions hoping that maybe the installer would rather create them itself. When i look at /proc/partitions now (after rebooting and getting the installer going again) it shows all the partitions including the ones I

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:29:07PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote: > Stephen, > > I am actually trying that now. The problem I keep hitting is when it loads > the partition manager it tries to detect drives. It keep dieing on that. I > will try to get a copy of the output log to post to the list. > >

Re: Kernel 2.6 for m68k/amiga

Hi, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Does no one know how to tell the linker file not to put a stack program header in the final object? The attached patch might help, the output looks ok, but I haven't actually booted the kernel yet... bye, Roman Index: arch/m68k/kernel/vmlinux-std.lds

Re: Quadra 700 install problem (sarge RC1)

Stephen R Marenka wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:36:59PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote: After having successfully installed sarge RC1 on Q800, Q660AV and an earlier TC on Q840AV, I'm having trouble installing the same RC1 on Quadra 700. The box has 20M of RAM only. The HDD is the same 3.2G that I use

Re: Quadra 700 install problem (sarge RC1)

Stephen, I am having a problem with a Q610. It is hanging when it tries to detect the drives after setting up the network and connecting to ftp.debian. It has already loaded the CDROM ISO image. I have the business card image from stable sarge. If I command-left arrow to see the text displays (t

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

Stephen, I am actually trying that now. The problem I keep hitting is when it loads the partition manager it tries to detect drives. It keep dieing on that. I will try to get a copy of the output log to post to the list. I know that dmesg gives the kernel messages. How do I get the stuff that is

Re: Quadra 700 install problem (sarge RC1)

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 02:36:59PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote: > After having successfully installed sarge RC1 on Q800, Q660AV and an > earlier TC on Q840AV, I'm having trouble installing the same RC1 on > Quadra 700. The box has 20M of RAM only. The HDD is the same 3.2G that I > used successfully in

Re: Pre-compiled for VME box?

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:18:15AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > * fully automatic partitioning will select ext3 as its file system, > which isn't supported by the 2.2 kernels. Actually the current 2.2.25 m68k kernels in sid and sarge do support ext3. You shouldn't be prompted for a file sy

Re: light weight desktop for browsing

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:06:43PM -0600, Tony Pitman wrote: > Thanks for the tips. I am still fighting with getting base deb > installed, > so I will keep this around for when I get that far. If you're having woody problems, then please test out debian-installer

Re: Pre-compiled for VME box?

Kars de Jong wrote: On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 06:05, Bill Janssen wrote: I have a VME box with a MVME 162-222 and a MVME 320B-1. The 162 I know something about but I know very little about the 320B. The 162 does not have disk support so the 320B would have to provide the disk interface. Does the D

Re: Pre-compiled for VME box?

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:30:30AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:18:14AM +0200, wrote: > > > I've got an mvme167 which is running Debian as well. If you want to > > > install sarge, I've put a (semi-working) installer im

Quadra 700 install problem (sarge RC1)

After having successfully installed sarge RC1 on Q800, Q660AV and an earlier TC on Q840AV, I'm having trouble installing the same RC1 on Quadra 700. The box has 20M of RAM only. The HDD is the same 3.2G that I used successfully in Q800 and Q600AV. Basically, kernel and initrd load. Last thing I se

Re: Pre-compiled for VME box?

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:30:30AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:18:14AM +0200, wrote: > > I've got an mvme167 which is running Debian as well. If you want to > > install sarge, I've put a (semi-working) installer image up at > > http://users.pandora.be/wouter.verhelst

Re: Pre-compiled for VME box?

On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 06:05, Bill Janssen wrote: > I have a VME box with a MVME 162-222 and a MVME 320B-1. The 162 I > know something about but I know very little about the 320B. > > The 162 does not have disk support so the 320B would have to provide the > disk > interface. > > Does the Debian

Re: m68k und ipv6?

Hi Christian, just for the record. The 2.4.27 image gives me the same kernel panic as all others. I've used the 2.4.27-mac, hope that's ok for my Quadra.. > IPv6 in any m68k kernel-image before 2.4.27 seems to be pretty minimal. I > activated all IPv6 options and am currently building packages

Re: Pre-compiled for VME box?

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:18:14AM +0200, wrote: > I've got an mvme167 which is running Debian as well. If you want to > install sarge, I've put a (semi-working) installer image up at > http://users.pandora.be/wouter.verhelst/mvme16x-install.tgz. Install a Okay, make that 'non-working'. Sorry. I'

Re: Pre-compiled for VME box?

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:05:34PM -0700, Bill Janssen wrote: > I have a VME box with a MVME 162-222 and a MVME 320B-1. The 162 I > know something about but I know very little about the 320B. > > The 162 does not have disk support so the 320B would have to provide > the disk interface. > > Does t

Re: Kernel 2.6 for m68k/amiga

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Storm66 wrote: > > > > Is it possible to get a 2.6 kernel for m68k or the "gener

Re: Kernel 2.6 for m68k/amiga

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Storm66 wrote: > > > Is it possible to get a 2.6 kernel for m68k or the "general" kernel from > > > debian is OK ? > > > > Please use the version from Lin

Re: Kernel 2.6 for m68k/amiga

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Storm66 wrote: > > Is it possible to get a 2.6 kernel for m68k or the "general" kernel from > > debian is OK ? > > Please use the version from Linux/m68k CVS, cfr. http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/ Or the ones

Re: Kernel 2.6 for m68k/amiga

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Storm66 wrote: > Is it possible to get a 2.6 kernel for m68k or the "general" kernel from > debian is OK ? Please use the version from Linux/m68k CVS, cfr. http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/ > Are there some pre-requisite to compile it ? (gcc or binutils version > for example). I