> "CK" == Carl Karsten writes:
>> You can see last year's schedule¹
All that looks good. But I am worried about what we don't see: the
rejected items.
Maybe in the future have a radio
( ) Only make my proposal public if it is approved.
( ) Make my proposal public now, even though it hasn't g
Reply at bottom :-
On 21/03/2018, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> "CK" == Carl Karsten writes:
>>> You can see last year's schedule¹
>
> All that looks good. But I am worried about what we don't see: the
> rejected items.
>
> Maybe in the future have a radio
> ( ) Only make my proposal public if
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:42:52PM +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> But then he is also too embarrassed to rally support for his proposals
> by posting them to debconf-discuss etc. instead of waiting for them to
> first be approved.
rallying for support on debconf-discuss and twitter and whatnot t
On 20.03.2018 23:07, Carl Karsten wrote:
> Can someone elaborate on why
> "unfortunately means rejecting some."
> is a reason to keep anything about this secret?
Because if we make public the rejection, less people will submit talks.
Debian (and Free Software) communities suffer of the impostor
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 02:15:32PM +0800, ijbuj...@gmail.com wrote:
> 你好，
>
> 保險公司方面表示，目前的方案是套裝組
> 需要我們提供
> 1.受保人(單位) 名稱，需有核對之印鑑
> 2.受保地點
受保單位: 財團法人開放文化基金會 (https://ocf.tw/)
受保地點: 國立交通大學 光復校區
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debconf,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04
Hi,
We will have a DC18 team meeting at Mar 22 2018 14:30 UTC. Please help
to update meeting agenda at http://deb.li/3OYuV.
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debconf,debian}.org
http://czchen.info/
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Descrip
OK keep them closed. But at least at the bottom of
https://debconf18.debconf.org/talks/new/
mention (before he hits the submit button) that
"Your proposal will be held for review and only will be made public if
approved."
Else it might take weeks for him to find that his e.g.,
https://debconf18.d
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> On 20.03.2018 23:07, Carl Karsten wrote:
>
>> Can someone elaborate on why
>> "unfortunately means rejecting some."
>> is a reason to keep anything about this secret?
>
> Because if we make public the rejection, less people will submit ta
Reply in-line :-
On 21/03/2018, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> OK keep them closed. But at least at the bottom of
> https://debconf18.debconf.org/talks/new/
> mention (before he hits the submit button) that
>
> "Your proposal will be held for review and only will be made public if
> approved."
>
Actu
