Hi!
micah anderson:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +0000, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
>>> Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
>>> explicitly choses by the participants to be no-photo zones, on top of
>
Hi!
Wouter Verhelst:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 04:56:00AM +0000, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
>> Furthermore, I would like to see a policy in which BoFs may be
>> explicitly choses by the participants to be no-photo zones, on top of
>> being marked as "non-recorded".
> I
Hi!
Gunnar Wolf:
> Aigars Mahinovs dijo [Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 03:36:59PM +0800]:
> So, I think that setting specific areas of the rooms (hacklabs
> included) as "no photo areas" would be workable. Having people get
> color-coded lanyards (specially when using wide lanyards, as we are
> doing this
Hi!
Taowa:
> *If* there were such a policy in place the current CoC would prohibit even
> takin such pictures, let alone publishing them.
>
> However, as others have mentioned, a system of different lanyard colours is
> difficult to manage for photographers.
Seems to work at IETF though :)
Ch
Hi!
it has been pointed out to me that there *is* a photo policy for DebConf
within the code of conduct. However, today I had to explicitly ask
somebody to refrain from taking pictures of me within a non recorded
BoF, namely the privacy BoF, and this person was being aggressive
towards me when bei
