Hi Paulo,
Am 13.11.19 um 17:53 schrieb Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana:
On 13/11/2019 14:11, Daniel Lange wrote:
I'm not happy to have "the local team" try and throw jobs they don't
want to do "over the fence". I actively resisted that on a recent
DebConf and so did other "senior" DebConf team
> "Gunnar" == Gunnar Wolf writes:
Gunnar> I understand this, and I understand this was one of the
Gunnar> perceived failure points in the previous delegation model
Gunnar> (the DebConf Chairs). However, the DebConf Team needs to
Gunnar> take care that DebConf organization prog
> (...)
> There are concerns that the active debconf-team is smaller than we'd
> like.
> In some cases it's been the local team plus not a lot else.
I agree this should _really_ not be the case. We have long tried to
counter the (quite natural TBH) split between local and global teams,
because it
Hi Daniel,
On 13/11/2019 14:11, Daniel Lange wrote:
>
> I'm not happy to have "the local team" try and throw jobs they don't
> want to do "over the fence". I actively resisted that on a recent
> DebConf and so did other "senior" DebConf team members.
Are you talking about something related to DC
Hi Sam,
Am 13.11.19 um 12:01 schrieb Sam Hartman:
The question is whether the committee should have a significant role in
keeping track of how active the debconf team is and working to find
volunteers to keep the organization vibrant.
The proposal we got both in the nominations process and that
> "Paulo" == Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana writes:
>> To emphasize: the committee's role is not to be the debconf team.
>> Committee members may be active members of the debconf team, and
>> certainly we need at least one or two who are very active in
>> debconf-team.
Pa
Hi Sam,
On 13/11/2019 09:01, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
>
> Hi.
> We got some interesting feedback during the nominations process that I
> just finished following up with.
> It is consistent with feedback I got talking to people in DC19.
>
> There are concerns that the active debconf-team is smaller
Hi.
We got some interesting feedback during the nominations process that I
just finished following up with.
It is consistent with feedback I got talking to people in DC19.
There are concerns that the active debconf-team is smaller than we'd
like.
In some cases it's been the local team plus not
