On 26/09/15 20:40, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tassia Camoes Araujo [2015-09-23 23:42 +0200]:
>> Do you think that the Chairs have any issue about the existance of
>> local team? This is not true. For DC16, the local team of Cape
>> Town made the *choice* of working within mixed teams of
On 23/09/15 18:59, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I haven't followed the current debate closely, so I won't comment on any
> specifics, except:
> On 23/09/15 at 13:15 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
>> I think this is a symptom of a problem that is actually built into the
>> current delegation.
>>
>> The dele
Hi all
Website:
* There is a local website meeting between Tammy (tamo), Raoul (superfly)
and Jonathan (highvoltage) tonight. I expect they will be on IRC for
chatting as well. This is not 'dev' stuff (what do I call that?), but to do
with design and content.
* There will likely not be a 'dev stuf
bugger, sorry, I forgot to include this one (was looking for it and then
got distracted)
DC15 final report sprint:
We're collecting content here:
https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf15/FinalReport
#dc-team Monday 1900 UTC.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Bernelle Verster
wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
also sprach Martín Ferrari [2015-09-28 10:33 +0200]:
> I agree with big parts of it, but I really don't understand what
> is being proposed here, or even what is being criticised. That the
> local team is asked to join long-lived teams instead of roaming
> free? Well, that was one of many points w
also sprach Martín Ferrari [2015-09-28 10:49 +0200]:
> It has been used, in situations where we felt that important parts
> of DebConf were at risk: budgetary decisions, sponsors
> relationships, volunteers motivation, and even some basic tenets
> of the conference were at stake. Every time this h
On 28/09/15 12:46, martin f krafft wrote:
> This is not to say that everything about the teams structure is bad,
> nor that "institutional memory, clear responsibilities, and
> boundaries" aren't necessary. But that there are learnings of the
> past 12 months that need to be considered, and two of
On 28/09/15 12:54, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martín Ferrari [2015-09-28 10:49 +0200]:
>> It has been used, in situations where we felt that important parts
>> of DebConf were at risk: budgetary decisions, sponsors
>> relationships, volunteers motivation, and even some basic tenets
>> of
Tincho,
if you want to take things to the personal level, I suggest you mail
me directly.
I refute all of your accusations, mostly because you chose to
present only half the picture.
You are of course entitled to your own opinion, yet I would kindly
like to ask you to refrain from spreading misi
On 28/09/15 at 11:49 +0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 23/09/15 18:59, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > I haven't followed the current debate closely, so I won't comment on any
> > specifics, except:
> > On 23/09/15 at 13:15 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> >> I think this is a symptom of a problem that is
also sprach martin f krafft [2015-09-26 21:37 +0200]:
> the DC15 final report needs to get done. We're collecting content
> here:
>
> https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf15/FinalReport
>
> Please see what you can contribute.
Thanks to everyone who took part in the little sprint. There is
sti
11 matches
Mail list logo
