On 18 September 2014 19:13, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez [2014-09-16 22:19 +0200]:
>> * We must find a way to make submitters to make better talks
>> descriptions. Bad or incomplete talks description made to waste
>> a lot of time to both the talks team and attendees.
>
also sprach Anthony Towns [2014-09-19 13:37 +0200]:
> Would some sort of wiki-ish approach to talk proposals be
> possible? ie, let people propose talk ideas publically, with the
> ability for other people to help improve the description, add
> suggestions or correct typos before the talk review h
[adding the talks team (back) to the CC list]
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:49:26PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Anthony Towns [2014-09-19 13:37 +0200]:
> > An alternative approach: just reject any talks with poor descriptions.
> > Try to tell submitters early if their description isn
