Hi Holger,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> so, you can flame now.
On the contrary: Many thanks for your detailed report and the insight
you gave. This draws a very better picture than past discussions here
on the list. Many thanks for this! Considering you also
Hello Allison,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 10/28/2012 12:16 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Okay, that's easy enough. I've commented out the link for the Spanish
> translation, and will change it to whatever translation language is
> chosen. (I'm leaving all t
Quoting the two points from Holger's email on payment terms:
"* About paying in advance: we agreed to put something in the contract
to pay
30k end of February 2012, second 30k end of May 2012, "but": two weeks
later
is fine and if we'd only had 25k at that moment it would also be no big
issue.
T
Hi,
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> For the instalments: has DebConf usually raised cash so quickly and so
> far in advance? I have previously heard that most cash comes 1 month
> before DebConf.
we already have 6k at least (=might be 11) plus those 2x20k plus its still >4
m
Hi,
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Raphaël Walther wrote:
> I think we should remove the permanent sponsors until they commit.
they commited already, thats why there "permanently" listed.
> Also
> I'd like to help on the website because I think that most of potential
> sponsors will have at least
Hi,
>> For the final bill:
>>
>> - at first glance, it appears positive that people won't be standing in
>> the street if money is not paid in advance, but a deeper reflection on
>> this should raise concerns
>
> well, yes, every coin has at least four sides, but really here for us, paying
> later
On 10/29/2012 09:30 AM, Raphaël Walther wrote:
>
> I think we should remove the permanent sponsors until they commit.
Okay, removed those as well.
> Also
> I'd like to help on the website because I think that most of potential
> sponsors will have at least a look on it.
Please, dive in, there'
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Philipp Hug wrote:
> I do agree, that there's a risk here. As we only get the final invoice
> after the conference we might get a surprise because we calculated
> differently than LeCamp.
right, there is a risk. but can we migate it, maybe? and if so how?
/me yawns.
On 29/10/12 10:59, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> For the instalments: has DebConf usually raised cash so quickly and so
>> far in advance? I have previously heard that most cash comes 1 month
>> before DebConf.
>
> we already have 6k at least
On 2012-10-29 08:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
Considering you also visited one
proposed alternative (Interlaken) I would like to trust you and the
voting (from first part) that Le Camp might make a nice DebConf.
The problem is not to answer "What is nicer?" but to be sure that we
choose something
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:10:37PM +, Moray Allan wrote:
>
> Only if it is shown that both options would work equally well for
> Debian in budget/risks/etc. is it relevant to ask which is nicer.
I have choosen the term "nice" more or less as a sign of optimism in
contrast of some very sad mes
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Moray Allan wrote:
> The problem is anyway not to answer "Le Camp vs. Interlaken". It has
> not yet been shown that either of these options will work with
> acceptable risks,
IMO it has for Le Camp.
___
Debconf-team mailing
On 29/10/12 14:10, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Moray Allan wrote:
>> The problem is anyway not to answer "Le Camp vs. Interlaken". It has
>> not yet been shown that either of these options will work with
>> acceptable risks,
>
> IMO it has for Le Camp.
There seem to be a
Hi,
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012, Moray Allan wrote:
> On 2012-10-28 23:52, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > we decide RSN.
> I would hope so.
No, just hoping is too little. We should activly work towards that goal!!
If we dont manage to decide in the next 14 days, I personally think that it
will be ve
Holger Levsen dijo [Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:52:23AM +0100]:
> So, as a meeting in Le Camp we came to the conclusion to recommend to the
> globalteam to have DebConf13 in Le Camp and also to come to a final decision
> rather fast. Thats why we want an IRC meeting soon, eg next Friday (November
>
Hi,
just some random data points on what I spent during my 3 days in Switzerland.
I didnt see a supermarket from inside, just kiosks & bars, basically.
4.10 CHF 1 tram (public transport) within Zurich, single trip
9.00 CHF 2 coffees in train
3.50 CHF crossaint and a cookie (in zurich)
6.90 C
Hi,
The updated budget from the weekend was just uploaded.
Changes:
* removed the registration fee
* Reduced some non-essential or too high budgeted expenses
* Created 2 separate sheets (normal, optimistic)
* Reduced number of corporate attendees to 1
I will further discuss this the budget with d
On 29/10/12 15:15, Philipp Hug wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The updated budget from the weekend was just uploaded.
> Changes:
> * removed the registration fee
> * Reduced some non-essential or too high budgeted expenses
> * Created 2 separate sheets (normal, optimistic)
> * Reduced number of corporate attende
Hi there!
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:50:56 +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
> I've checked in a restyle on the dc13 website. Just theme changes so
> far, no content changes. I went for a red & white theme, inspired by the
> logo. All contributions or changes gladly welcomed. :)
Allison, Eric and Ana (who
Hi,
http://layer-acht.org/fotos/670_Switzerland_DC13-pre/ has some photos I took
this weekend. Please excuse the crappy quality! :-)
Some stats I forgot so far:
- 5-10 RC bugs squashed (some people did work on this a bit, but we didnt
really keep track...)
- 3kg cheese were eaten, I guess
- on
Hi,
This email is from darst (who takes responsibility for most editorial
opinions) and hug, about budget things.
Le Camp:
- ~ 95 kCHF fixed costs, which about matches a "safe" initial
sponsorship estimate.
(65 kCHF all accom and 30 kCHF other)
- This is with no attendees. Each additional at
21 matches
Mail list logo
