On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:56:09AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> So, let's say that _you're_ on the video team, having pointed a camera a
> few times, and directed once or twice, and you've just come up with a
> really exciting idea for a BoF at short notice, and you simply _know_
> that the group o
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:02:50 +0200, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
>
> > Would we like to adjust the weekend schedule again, since there is no
> > John Jay then?
> >
>
> I think changing the schedule depending on the day will confuse people, so
> unle
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:58:05 -0400, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> We had only 9 people filling in the poll.
>
> The meeting will take place this Saturday at 2100UTC. This is 5PM New York
> time.
>
> That leave us with an expected attendee list of only 7-8 people as follows:
>
> Jimmy
> schultmc
> Enis
On 07/16/2010 02:06 AM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> -we need a homer (or somewhere else) to run dc10.debconf.org DNS (amongst
> other things (but far fewer other things than most years))
I can bring a low-power machine to run DNS if you like. I don't have
anything spare that remotely approache
Hi!
I have been a Debian User for over 10 years and I am still a user and
not a developer. I am planning to attend Debian Day on August 1. After
that, I could volunteer a few days to the conference.
I see myself staffing the registration desk, tydiing up after the day,
greeting participants
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:57:47AM -0400, Charles-Andre Roy wrote:
> I have been a Debian User for over 10 years and I am still a user and
> not a developer. I am planning to attend Debian Day on August 1. After
> that, I could volunteer a few days to the conference.
Hi Charles!
Thanks for yo
On 07/15/2010 12:02 PM, Moray Allan wrote:
> I think changing the schedule depending on the day will confuse people, so
> unless there's a strong positive reason to change I'd suggest we keep things
> fixed.
With my scheduler hat on, i'm going to agree with Moray here. I also
don't think we want
Hi,
Here is the "final" hours for security requested:
http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/security.pdf
It can be changed with reasonable (~2 days) notice (and we can get a
refund).
- Richard
--
| Richard Darst - rkd@ - boltzmann: up 360 days, 15:52
|http://rkd.zgib.net -
On Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2010, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> > If we are open to allowing this, and have the ability to do so, I would
> > support this.
> +1
+1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
De
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2010, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>> > If we are open to allowing this, and have the ability to do so, I would
>> > support this.
>> +1
>
> +1
Richard,
There seems to be some level of consensus that, in the abstract, this
is
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 04:36:21PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2010, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> >> > If we are open to allowing this, and have the ability to do so, I would
> >> > support this.
> >> +1
> >
> > +1
>
> Ric
Can people send report backs to the mailing list prior to this
meeting? (This got suggested by Moray). Particularly if you can't make
it and have something worth reporting
Muchas Thanks,
P.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.or
12 matches
Mail list logo
