On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> A long while somebody in #debconf-team asked if we can have plain
> t-shirts available for sale without sponsor logos.
I share that wish.
> That is of course a valid question and I would like to share my
> feelings about it: it would be a v
Moin,
On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Is anyone interested in acting as Scheduler? Does anyone with
> experience from scheduling past debconfs have advice to offer?
do not schedule anything without giving at least 24h "warning" in advance.
never.
(and to repeat: I'm
Hi,
If you edit an attendee from the admin interface and this person has reconfirmed
attendance already, this selection is undone (it is set as if the attendee has
not reconfirmed). I do not know if this has something to do with this option
not appearing when editing an attendee from the admin v
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:01:20AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> There was quite a bit of discussion about having a select few events
> scheduled with no other concurrent events. We are calling these
> "Plenaries" for the moment. If we decide we want to have them, we might
> run into a bi
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > Is anyone interested in acting as Scheduler? Does anyone with
> > experience from scheduling past debconfs have advice to offer?
>
> do not schedule anything without givi
On 05/27/2010 08:47 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:01:20AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> There was quite a bit of discussion about having a select few events
>> scheduled with no other concurrent events.
>
> What are the criteria for these "select few"?
I would assu
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> What do you think the criteria should be? Or would you prefer no
> plenaries at all?
I don't think I can answer this because I'm not yet sure what the
point of them is.
___
Debconf-t
On 05/27/2010 11:01 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> What do you think the criteria should be? Or would you prefer no
>> plenaries at all?
>
> I don't think I can answer this because I'm not yet sure what the
> point of them is.
One
On 05/22/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
> leave one of the three categories in a "don't know" state.
[...]
> Any thoughts on this? Am i misunderstanding something?
OK, i've looked into this further. edrz pointed
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:36:49PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:22:33PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> > > 1. It was also noted that we can always add more rooms and slots later.
> >
> > The smaller room (414, i think) on the same room as Davis auditorium
(for tracking purposes, forwarded to pentab...@debconf.org, which goes
to the RT instance)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:40:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 05/22/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
> > leave o
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:45:11PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> (for tracking purposes, forwarded to pentab...@debconf.org, which goes
> to the RT instance)
Unnecessarily, in this case I now see ... since it is cleared up. Sorry
for not reading before forwarding. -edrz
___
forwared to RT
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:34:49PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> attached.
>
> -edrz
> >From 7747fad21e5c5768f7c51ae9d07f133bea00af28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:31:20 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Increase size of event a
forwarded to pentab...@debconf.org for RT
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:19:31PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If you edit an attendee from the admin interface and this person has
> reconfirmed
> attendance already, this selection is undone (it is set as if the attendee has
> not reconfirm
The headers on the dc10 schedule pages need updating; they still show
dc9 headers afaict:
https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc10
I have no idea who can fix this, but hopefully a ticket will help keep
it on the radar.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:19:58PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> The headers on the dc10 schedule pages need updating; they still show
> dc9 headers afaict:
>
> https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc10
>
> I have no idea who can fix this, but hopefully a ticket will help keep
> it on
(replying w/ rt # in subject + added note)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:14:42PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:19:58PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > The headers on the dc10 schedule pages need updating; they still show
> > dc9 headers afaict:
> > https://p
17 matches
Mail list logo
