micah anderson dijo [Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:25:31PM -0400]:
> > Your e-mail referred a couple times to a "FLOSS track", but i think
> > there is no current FLOSS track, according to [0]. Do you mean the
> > Community Outreach track? Or do you mean more broadly talks that are
> > more about FLOSS
micah dijo [Fri, May 28, 2010 at 01:33:59PM -0400]:
> (...)
> Personally, I think Debconf can both get a bit boring if the 'relevance'
> is applied too strictly, and too de-focused if it is applied to
> broadly. To make a great conference there should be a balance, and I
> feel like right now it is
On Fri, 28 May 2010 13:50:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> Your e-mail referred a couple times to a "FLOSS track", but i think
> there is no current FLOSS track, according to [0]. Do you mean the
> Community Outreach track? Or do you mean more broadly talks that are
> more about FLOSS t
Hi micah--
Thanks for bringing this up!
On 05/28/2010 01:33 PM, micah wrote:
> Personally, I think Debconf can both get a bit boring if the 'relevance'
> is applied too strictly, and too de-focused if it is applied to
> broadly. To make a great conference there should be a balance, and I
> feel l
