On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 09:56:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 21:31 +0100]:
> > > What about the list of presenters/organisers?
> >
> > Currently the submitter of the event is the drafter(owner) of the event,
> > we need to make sure if summit can handle
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 09:56:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 21:31 +0100]:
> > > What about the list of presenters/organisers?
> >
> > Currently the submitter of the event is the drafter(owner) of the event,
> > we need to make sure if summit can handle
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:39:12AM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]:
> > > 1) Title
> ...
> > > 7) Notes to Content team (New requested type)
> >
> > What about the list of
also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [2015-01-21 06:39 +0100]:
> Do you mean the list that an event proposer/creator gets to choose
> from to select Participants?
>
> I recall some were concerned about this exposing the list of
> attendees.
How about letting others sign up for events and then the o
also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [2015-01-21 06:27 +0100]:
> To my thinking, ad-hoc is not an attribute of an event, but of the
> combination of time slot and room into which it might be scheduled. In
> summit-speak, I think we should make a new Ad-hoc type of a Slot. It is
> probably possible to
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]:
> > 1) Title
...
> > 7) Notes to Content team (New requested type)
>
> What about the list of presenters/organisers?
Do you mean the list that an event proposer/creator gets to c
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]:
...
> > 4) Type:
> > + Plenary
> > + Talk (New requested type, s/Presentation/Talk/)
> Just out of curiosity: why?
> > + BoF
> > + Social (New requested type)
> >
also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 21:31 +0100]:
> > What about the list of presenters/organisers?
>
> Currently the submitter of the event is the drafter(owner) of the event,
> we need to make sure if summit can handle multiple owners for one talk,
> a field for this can be included, but also
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]:
> > 4) Type:
> > + Plenary
> > + Talk (New requested type, s/Presentation/Talk/)
> Just out of curiosity: why?
During the discussion about this, some people feel that Talk
also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]:
> 1) Title
> 2) Description
> 3) Track
> 4) Type:
> + Plenary
> + Talk (New requested type, s/Presentation/Talk/)
Just out of curiosity: why?
> + BoF
> + Social (New requested type)
> + Special event.
> + Ad-Hoc (New requ
10 matches
Mail list logo