On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach René Mayorga <rmayo...@debian.org.sv> [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]: ... > > 4) Type: > > + Plenary > > + Talk (New requested type, s/Presentation/Talk/) > Just out of curiosity: why? > > + BoF > > + Social (New requested type) > > + Special event. > > + Ad-Hoc (New requested type) > Will you disable ad-hoc submissions until the conference?
To my thinking, ad-hoc is not an attribute of an event, but of the combination of time slot and room into which it might be scheduled. In summit-speak, I think we should make a new Ad-hoc type of a Slot. It is probably possible to make it so that such slot/room combinations aren't available for scheduling until we want them to be. i.e. 24 hours in advance, or whatever time limit content team decides. Then within those slots any appropriate type (talk, BoF, social, discussion, what-have-you) of Ad-Hoc events could be scheduled. Being Ad-Hoc is about when an event's creator(s) gets to claim space and time for it. Not about what said event is going to do with that space&time. -edrz _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team