Hi!
* Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060412 23:15]:
> Well, there's at least one paper which, ahem, is a bit long...:-)
> /me hides...
You can run but you can't hide!
BTW: For next year I would propose some kind of a seperate review phase
for the papers. Although we offered the spea
> > This makes it 157 or 161 pages. I don't have my
> > DC5 proceedings here, how long was it? I have the impression it was
> > half the size at most, am I _so_ far off?
>
> 112 pages last year. Not half the size, but still not that many.
Well, there's at least one paper which, ahem, is a bit l
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> - OpenSolaris and Debian: Can we be friends? by Simon Phipps and Alvaro
> Lopez Ortega
> Uh, they didn't knew about the papers and didn't got any mails;
> probaly our fault - could it be, that we sent the reminders only to
> talks, but not to
Hi!
* Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060412 03:35]:
> Ok, great job!
Thanks. Thanks to Google and Ganneff for helping with that, too ;)
> So, right now we have 106 pages. I suppose we will be printing this in
> half-letter format, just as last year, right?
Oh, good, that reminds me, that I
Alexander Schmehl dijo [Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:31:02PM +0200]:
> Hi!
>
> Some of you might have noticed a new folder in the -data svn called
> "procedings". As you might expect it contains the procedings ;)
>
> They are nearly ready to go to print; some papers are still missing (of
> which some
Hi!
Some of you might have noticed a new folder in the -data svn called
"procedings". As you might expect it contains the procedings ;)
They are nearly ready to go to print; some papers are still missing (of
which some asked for more time, some other speakers are just black
holes).
If you woul
