Hi! * Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060412 23:15]:
> Well, there's at least one paper which, ahem, is a bit long...:-) > /me hides... You can run but you can't hide! BTW: For next year I would propose some kind of a seperate review phase for the papers. Although we offered the speakers to review their papers, not a single one used this oportunity. All submitted their papers quite late. So now we are standing here, with some papers to long, some papers in the wrong format, and some were submitted with the comment "should be proof read by an non en_DE reader". All in all it might be even an idea to rethink our "we use LaTeX, looks best" concept; sometimes it's quite difficult to get all that stuff together in LaTeX (but would be far more easier, if there weren't docbook xml submissions with tables). Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
