On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:45:11PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> (for tracking purposes, forwarded to pentab...@debconf.org, which goes
> to the RT instance)
Unnecessarily, in this case I now see ... since it is cleared up. Sorry
for not reading before forwarding. -edrz
___
(for tracking purposes, forwarded to pentab...@debconf.org, which goes
to the RT instance)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:40:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 05/22/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
> > leave o
On 05/22/2010 06:41 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
> leave one of the three categories in a "don't know" state.
[...]
> Any thoughts on this? Am i misunderstanding something?
OK, i've looked into this further. edrz pointed
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 18:41 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
> leave one of the three categories in a "don't know" state.
>
> for example, if i say "+" for all three categories (relevance,
> actuality, acceptance), the score
I'm concerned that the rating metric is wrong in penta when reviewers
leave one of the three categories in a "don't know" state.
for example, if i say "+" for all three categories (relevance,
actuality, acceptance), the score will be 50. (50 + 50 + 50)/3
if i say "+" for relevance and acceptance,
