On 07/15/2010 12:02 PM, Moray Allan wrote:
> I think changing the schedule depending on the day will confuse people, so
> unless there's a strong positive reason to change I'd suggest we keep things
> fixed.
With my scheduler hat on, i'm going to agree with Moray here. I also
don't think we want
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:02:50 +0200, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
>
> > Would we like to adjust the weekend schedule again, since there is no
> > John Jay then?
> >
>
> I think changing the schedule depending on the day will confuse people, so
> unle
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> Would we like to adjust the weekend schedule again, since there is no
> John Jay then?
>
I think changing the schedule depending on the day will confuse people, so
unless there's a strong positive reason to change I'd suggest we keep things
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> Now to raise something again...
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 03:58:15AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:05:39PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
>
> > Another consideration: on the weekends, we aren't going to use the
>
Now to raise something again...
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 03:58:15AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:05:39PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> Another consideration: on the weekends, we aren't going to use the
> cafeteria, and thus can make our own hours.
>
> I think that at l
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:05:39PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the talk schedule and hours for John Jay (cafeteria),
> which we were likely going to use during debconf.
>
> B: 0700-0945
> L: 1130-1400
> D: 1700-1900
Another consideration: on the weekends, we aren't goi
