Joerg Jaspert dijo [Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:42:11AM +0200]:
>
> > While at it, we should also encourage people to rate the events they
> > attended to, in order to give feedback to the authors/presenters.
>
> We HAVE a feedback system.
> We turn it on each DebConf.
>
> Attendees are lazy.
>
> I
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:27:22PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Andreas Tille dijo [Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:15:00AM +0200]:
> > At some point in time (IMHO when DC 9 was running) there was a
> > suggestion to publish the rating numbers in some way. I'd be in favour
> > of this (but I'm not so terri
> While at it, we should also encourage people to rate the events they
> attended to, in order to give feedback to the authors/presenters.
We HAVE a feedback system.
We turn it on each DebConf.
Attendees are lazy.
If you get them to use it, great.
--
bye, Joerg
I think Smithers picked me beca
Andreas Tille dijo [Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:15:00AM +0200]:
> At some point in time (IMHO when DC 9 was running) there was a
> suggestion to publish the rating numbers in some way. I'd be in favour
> of this (but I'm not so terribly keen on it that I would volunteer to
> implement it :-)).
Humm,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> No, of course! We currently "opened" two rooms, both of which will
> be recorded/streamed. I put all of the BoFs in the second room, as I
> was told it's better suited, but it does not mean they are less
> important or that they won't have vide
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:13:09PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> Agreed. Now, if getting "pre-scheduled" is the only benefit of having
> a talks selection team, we could think about dropping the team and
> just scheduling everything. After all, a relatively large group of us
> rated the talks and
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:53:01PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > The event
> > Measuring Team Performance (712)
> > is also very strongly connected to Blends (the effort was actually
> > invented to see how a Blend works but it will be useful for other teams
> > inside Debian.
>
> humm, this w
Daniel Kahn Gillmor dijo [Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:53:11AM -0400]:
> > • We are scheduling so far on two rooms only. We can add a BoF room if
> > needed, but it will not have video coverage, and we should only open
> > it if the schedule gets too full before the confernce.
>
> last year, we had
Andreas Tille dijo [Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:34:20AM +0200]:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 04:48:25PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > ‣ Blends — Only one talk, although there is at least one other that
>
> You are probably refering to
> Blending Debian (711)
> But I would also see the fol
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 04:48:25PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> ‣ Blends — Only one talk, although there is at least one other that
You are probably refering to
Blending Debian (711)
But I would also see the following events (not "lectures") in this field
Debian Science Roundtable
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:53:11AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 05:48 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> last year, we had two rooms with video team coverage, with a third,
> un-videoed room. Given that some BoFs are quite clear that they want
> v-t coverage, I don't think that dividing
On 06/18/2011 05:48 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Ok, so I spent some time scheduling the top-rated talks today, and we
> have a preliminary schedule to start working with. Yay!
Thank you, Gunnar!
> • We are scheduling so far on two rooms only. We can add a BoF room if
> needed, but it will not have
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:48:25 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So, we have two very short tracks, and two tracks that cannot be
> fitted in the schedule I'd set for them (4hr - A full
> afternoon-evening session).
How about setting the long tracks up on either two afternoons or
morning+afternoon
Ok, so I spent some time scheduling the top-rated talks today, and we
have a preliminary schedule to start working with. Yay!
Now, the schedule is preliminary if you are very optimist. Some points
we still have to go through, and that will surely change things all
around. So, with no particular or
14 matches
Mail list logo
