On 07/15/2010 05:51 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 05:04 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
>> The later spot, please. It would be bad to loose a bunch of people due
>> to the early scheduling.
[...]
> I lean toward the consistent schedule, but i'm open to feedback, and i
> don't want to ke
On 07/15/2010 05:04 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> The later spot, please. It would be bad to loose a bunch of people due
> to the early scheduling.
> I will try to find a place in the shade for the shoot (when I'll be on-site).
>
> If it makes scheduling easier, 12:00-12:30 should be sufficient tim
On 15 July 2010 23:39, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Any preference for a 9:30-10:30 slot vs. 11:30-12:30 ?
>
The later spot, please. It would be bad to loose a bunch of people due
to the early scheduling.
I will try to find a place in the shade for the shoot (when I'll be on-site).
If it makes s
On 07/15/2010 03:30 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> Micah is correct. It can also be a 30-45m slot just before lunch or
> dinner, so that impact of delaying people for 5-10 minutes extra is
> minimal.
Any preference for a 9:30-10:30 slot vs. 11:30-12:30 ?
I've cleared up space on Thursday morning.
On 15 July 2010 22:01, micah anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:34:09 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>> On 07/15/2010 01:16 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
>> > Regarding the Schedule, it looks fine, BUT there shouldn't be
>> > something scheduled at the same time that the group photo.
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:34:09 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 01:16 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > Regarding the Schedule, it looks fine, BUT there shouldn't be
> > something scheduled at the same time that the group photo. This was
> > scheduled during the afternoon break a
On 07/15/2010 01:16 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Regarding the Schedule, it looks fine, BUT there shouldn't be
> something scheduled at the same time that the group photo. This was
> scheduled during the afternoon break and it's now parallel to 2 other
> talks.
Whoops, you're right. the prev
Hi!
> Thanks! It looks right to me. Marga, can you take a look at the
> schedule when you get a chance and let me know if i've faithfully
> interpreted your proposal?
>
> https://penta.debconf.org/penta/schedule/dc10/
Regarding the Schedule, it looks fine, BUT there shouldn't be
something sche
On 07/14/2010 06:29 PM, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:12:23AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Could one person (only!) with write access please make this change and
>> report back when it is done? I could webmonkey click change it all, but
>> i'd really rather not.
>
>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:12:23AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Could one person (only!) with write access please make this change and
> report back when it is done? I could webmonkey click change it all, but
> i'd really rather not.
Done. As discussed on IRC, please verify that it did the
On 07/14/2010 03:50 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 13. Juli 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> None has been selected. schultmc was the only person good enough to
>> voice an opinion (he prefers Z). Of course, i'm assuming that marga
>> prefers M.
>
> (Ana wrote she preferes M.)
so sh
Hi,
On Dienstag, 13. Juli 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> None has been selected. schultmc was the only person good enough to
> voice an opinion (he prefers Z). Of course, i'm assuming that marga
> prefers M.
(Ana wrote she preferes M.)
/me too prefers M,
Holger
signature.asc
Des
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:32:17PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> 0 and X both make it so that there will not be much time for attendees
> of the later sessions to actually get dinner.
As well as the video-team members on duty, I imagine.
___
Debcon
(No need to CC me, I read the list)
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:32:17PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 05:24 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >> On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 0
On 07/13/2010 05:24 PM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>>
To recap the proposals:
(0 is the stat
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> >> 0: 10:00-12:00, LUNCH, 14:00-16:00, Break, 16:30-19:30
> >>
> >> M: 9:30-12:30, LUNCH, 14:00-18:00
> >> X: 9:30-11:30, LUNCH, 13:00-15:00, Break, 15:30-18:30
> >> Y: 9:00-12:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >
> >> To recap the proposals:
> >>
> >> (0 is the status quo)
> >>
> >> 0: 10:00-12:00, LUNCH, 14:00-16:
On 07/12/2010 02:31 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> To recap the proposals:
>>
>> (0 is the status quo)
>>
>> 0: 10:00-12:00, LUNCH, 14:00-16:00, Break, 16:30-19:30
>>
>> M: 9:30-12:30, LUNCH, 14:00-18:00
>> X: 9:30-11:30, LU
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> To recap the proposals:
>
> (0 is the status quo)
>
> 0: 10:00-12:00, LUNCH, 14:00-16:00, Break, 16:30-19:30
>
> M: 9:30-12:30, LUNCH, 14:00-18:00
> X: 9:30-11:30, LUNCH, 13:00-15:00, Break, 15:30-18:30
> Y: 9:00-12:00,
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 09:55:52AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> To recap the proposals:
>
> (0 is the status quo)
>
> 0: 10:00-12:00, LUNCH, 14:00-16:00, Break, 16:30-19:30
>
> M: 9:30-12:30, LUNCH, 14:00-18:00
> X: 9:30-11:30, LUNCH, 13:00-15:00, Break, 15:30-18:30
> Y: 9:00-12:0
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Could other dc10 orga folks voice preferences here?
I like Z the most, X the second most. I can further rank choices if
needed.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.
On 07/08/2010 08:48 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>> On 07/08/2010 06:49 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
>>> How about, rescheduling M:
>>>
>>> * move pre-lunch events 30 minutes earlier and add 1 slot (start at
>>> 9:30, end at 12:30)
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 23:38:58 -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:24:51PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> > and i think we need to acknowledge that some people will be in the
> > cafeteria during some of the scheduled events.
>
> I haven't seen this anywhere yet, so one
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:24:51PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> and i think we need to acknowledge that some people will be in the
> cafeteria during some of the scheduled events.
I haven't seen this anywhere yet, so one question I have is:
How many people go to a talk at _every_ slot, v
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 06:49 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
>> How about, rescheduling M:
>>
>> * move pre-lunch events 30 minutes earlier and add 1 slot (start at
>> 9:30, end at 12:30), move post-luch events 1 hour earlier (start at
>> 14:00) a
On 07/08/2010 06:49 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> How about, rescheduling M:
>
> * move pre-lunch events 30 minutes earlier and add 1 slot (start at
> 9:30, end at 12:30), move post-luch events 1 hour earlier (start at
> 14:00) and DO NOT have the half hour break from 16 to 16:30 (end at
> 18:0
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> concerns. I'll call this rescheduling X:
>
> * move pre-lunch events 30 minutes earlier, move post-lunch events 1
> hour earlier. This would mean every scheduled event would end by 18:30.
> however, that's not much time for attendee
On 07/08/2010 12:05 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> I was looking at the talk schedule and hours for John Jay (cafeteria),
> which we were likely going to use during debconf.
>
> B: 0700-0945
> L: 1130-1400
> D: 1700-1900
>
> Lunch overlaps well, with or without the changes from Monday's global
> meet
Hi,
I was looking at the talk schedule and hours for John Jay (cafeteria),
which we were likely going to use during debconf.
B: 0700-0945
L: 1130-1400
D: 1700-1900
Lunch overlaps well, with or without the changes from Monday's global
meeting.
However, the last talk ends at 19:30, which doesn't
29 matches
Mail list logo
