On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 28/05/13 23:18, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> Steve Langasek dijo [Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:38:53PM -0700]:
>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I'm just following up on this, I've started to make some contacts ab
On 28/05/13 23:18, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Steve Langasek dijo [Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:38:53PM -0700]:
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> I'm just following up on this, I've started to make some contacts about
>>> the Free RTC track and there is some positive progre
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:18:35PM -0500]:
> > Please use a clearer name for this track. I know that you're not talking
> > about a track dedicated to real-time clocks, but I only know that due to the
> > context of reading your blog.
>
> I agree with Steve here, as I told you by p
Steve Langasek dijo [Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:38:53PM -0700]:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > I'm just following up on this, I've started to make some contacts about
> > the Free RTC track and there is some positive progress.
>
> > To make this a track, are ther
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I'm just following up on this, I've started to make some contacts about
> the Free RTC track and there is some positive progress.
> To make this a track, are there any more formal steps to be taken other
> than getting abstracts/resp
On 28/05/13 01:37, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Daniel Pocock dijo [Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0200]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm just following up on this, I've started to make some contacts about
>> the Free RTC track and there is some positive progress.
>>
>> To make this a track, are there any more formal s
Daniel Pocock dijo [Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0200]:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just following up on this, I've started to make some contacts about
> the Free RTC track and there is some positive progress.
>
> To make this a track, are there any more formal steps to be taken other
> than getting abs
Hi,
I'm just following up on this, I've started to make some contacts about
the Free RTC track and there is some positive progress.
To make this a track, are there any more formal steps to be taken other
than getting abstracts/responses to the call for papers?
Regards,
Daniel
On 11/04/13 20:
Hi all,
Now that tracks/talks are starting to appear on the radar, I'll be happy
to help organise an RTC track. I would propose reaching out to both the
SIP and XMPP communities on behalf of DebConf, organising maybe half a
day of talks, and then something like the panel discussion that was hel
