Steve Langasek dijo [Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:38:53PM -0700]: > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > I'm just following up on this, I've started to make some contacts about > > the Free RTC track and there is some positive progress. > > > To make this a track, are there any more formal steps to be taken other > > than getting abstracts/responses to the call for papers? > > Please use a clearer name for this track. I know that you're not talking > about a track dedicated to real-time clocks, but I only know that due to the > context of reading your blog.
I agree with Steve here, as I told you by private mail. RTC might be clear enough for you, and I understand you want to push the use of this allegedly more correct term, but for people to understand it, I don't think it's the right naming. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
