Ana Guerrero dijo [Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:21:42PM +0100]:
> I just sent my questions after reading carefully through the bid pages
> and I'm not sure if the bid teams will have time to answer them all before
> Friday. I also know some other members of the committee didn't have time
> to read th
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:43:33AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> - We should try to keep the meeting at a maximum of 1 hour. As it has
> happened in the past, if we feel we cannot reach a decision, we
> should suspend and call for another meeting in 1-2 weeks time, after
> some more on-
Christian PERRIER dijo [Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:00:48PM +0100]:
> > Based on the outcome of the Doodle poll, even with some missing
> > participants, the date/time preferred by most is on Friday March 22,
> > 17:00UTC. So, some points:
>
> Ouch. Either I messed up with Doodle...or there was no oth
On 2013-03-18 21:31, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Ok - So, we basically agree. My option was to have the meeting and,
if
everything was finalized enough, we could come out with a winner
bid. If not (and that's the most probable outcome), the second
meeting
is still warranted.
I really don't want to cr
On 2013-03-19 00:11, Steve Langasek wrote:
For my edification, does "extra documents" refer to this?:
For the decision meeting, bid teams prepare:
A description of how their bid meets each of the points on the
priority
list.
A description of the weak points in their own bids.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 08:25:35PM +0300, Moray Allan wrote:
> On 2013-03-18 20:15, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >I do feel that, given that we have slipped quite a bit on our
> >schedule
> >*and* that we have got acknowledgements from both teams *and* that
> >questions have been actively raised on the lis
Quoting Gunnar Wolf (gw...@gwolf.org):
> Hi,
>
> Based on the outcome of the Doodle poll, even with some missing
> participants, the date/time preferred by most is on Friday March 22,
> 17:00UTC. So, some points:
Ouch. Either I messed up with Doodle...or there was no other
possibility, but that
Moray Allan dijo [Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 08:49:17PM +0300]:
> In case it's not clear:
>
> I would be happy for the second meeting to be only a few days later,
> if that can be arranged, if teams feel that they won't have any
> significant additional answers to give after that. So I'm not
> suggesti
On 2013-03-18 20:25, Moray Allan wrote:
In addition to that, there are a number of extra steps that need to
be done before the decision meeting, including extra documents to be
posted to the list by the bids. It doesn't (for example) seem fair
to
me to ask the bids at short notice to rush out
On 2013-03-18 20:15, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I do feel that, given that we have slipped quite a bit on our
schedule
*and* that we have got acknowledgements from both teams *and* that
questions have been actively raised on the lists for the last week at
least (and a call for further questions is semi-
Moray Allan dijo [Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:54:19PM +0300]:
> On 2013-03-18 18:43, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >- We should try to keep the meeting at a maximum of 1 hour. As it has
> > happened in the past, if we feel we cannot reach a decision, we
> > should suspend and call for another meeting in 1-2 w
On 2013-03-18 18:43, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
- We should try to keep the meeting at a maximum of 1 hour. As it has
happened in the past, if we feel we cannot reach a decision, we
should suspend and call for another meeting in 1-2 weeks time,
after
some more on-list discussion.
I'm a bit conf
Hi,
Based on the outcome of the Doodle poll, even with some missing
participants, the date/time preferred by most is on Friday March 22,
17:00UTC. So, some points:
- The meeting will be public, in #debconf-team as usual
- An express invitation to attend goes to all committee members
(including
13 matches
Mail list logo
