On 2013-03-18 21:31, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Ok - So, we basically agree. My option was to have the meeting and,
if
everything was finalized enough, we could come out with a winner
bid. If not (and that's the most probable outcome), the second
meeting
is still warranted.
I really don't want to create another fight thread, but I think we need
to be clear whether this is the "Bid status meeting" or "Venue decision
meeting", not just see how we feel on the day. For me, there's no
strong reason for us to give up on the two-meeting process that we
carefully designed before, so it should be the "Bid status meeting".
And I know that some people are still reading the bids and writing
questions they plan to send. It's hard for me to see how the bids can
answer all of those (and prepare the extra notes for the decision
meeting) in time for us to think about the answers (and maybe reply with
further questions) before Friday.
--
Moray
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
