Gaudenz Steinlin dijo [Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:57:06PM +0200]:
> *** No/Less sponsored food ***
>
> Not providing food at all or just some meals (breakfast and/or dinner).
> This means that one or two meals per day have to be paid by the
> attendees themselves or they just don't eat that meal. Thi
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 24. Oktober 2012, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Doing this might reduce the number of attendees, because some might just
> not be able to afford paying for food themselves. This in turn would
> increase our per attendee costs. Overall we could save as much as about
> 100'000.- CHF if
On 2012-10-25 07:49, Richard Darst wrote:
Actually, this would make a lot of sense for breakfast. Considering
breakfast is the meal that is most often not included,
Right. Previous years established that many attendees have no interest
in breakfast, at least at conventional breakfast times,
Ohh... good points.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 07:33:25AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> I just want to emphasize that although I have contributed some comments
> on self-cooking, I am not arguing that it is a `magic solution' or that
> it is desirable
> http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/SelfCook
I just want to emphasize that although I have contributed some comments
on self-cooking, I am not arguing that it is a `magic solution' or that
it is desirable
http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/SelfCooking
But I think it belongs in this discussion about food
Just to clarify the alternatives, it
Hi
*** No/Less sponsored food ***
Not providing food at all or just some meals (breakfast and/or dinner).
This means that one or two meals per day have to be paid by the
attendees themselves or they just don't eat that meal. This is easier
with the Interlaken proposal as there are restaurants ar
