Hi all!
Since the can of worms has been opened, thanks Enrico and all hail
Pandora, I hope I do not offend by reading this thread and the
aforementioned Code. I will add my two copper pieces and hope I am
being constructive.
I generally agree with the spirit and particulars of this discussion.
I d
I missed a "by" in my draft. Can someone add it please?
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 03:10:28PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > Same. And since the discussion seems to have stalled, I think we
> > should push this live. Where do you want to see this, Enrico?
> I'd like to see it here: http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml
Thank you all for making this happe
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:34:16PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Same. And since the discussion seems to have stalled, I think we
> should push this live. Where do you want to see this, Enrico?
I'd like to see it here: http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml
I found the email address for the Co
also sprach Enrico Zini [2015-03-24 10:05 +0100]:
> > By default, all presentation material should be suitable for people
> > aged 12 and above.
> >
> > If you could reasonably assume that some people may be offended your
> > talk, please state so explicitly in the submission notes. This will be
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:06:37PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Enrico Zini wrote:
>
> > Neither able (for lack of knowledge of the debconf orga structure) nor
> > willing (for lack of time and general overcommittment), sorry.
>
> I am not sure who, if anyon
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:05 PM, gregor herrmann
wrote:
> This sounds much like what was proposed in the discussion about the
> DebConf CoC back in September on -discuss (although referring to
> other lines in the "Be inclusive" section). IIRC this mail from Marga
> was very well received:
>
> http
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Neither able (for lack of knowledge of the debconf orga structure) nor
> willing (for lack of time and general overcommittment), sorry.
I am not sure who, if anyone, is actually _responsible_ for this. I
poked off-list for someone I think is
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:58:02AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > Seems like the changes never made it to the website afterwards ...
> Which seems to be a recurring issue.
> Enrico, would you be able & willing to drive this?
Neither able (for lack of knowledge of the debconf orga structure) n
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:08:57 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I noticed in http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml, that is required to
> be accepted by speakers in DebConf, that is still says "All presentation
> material should be suitable for people aged 12 and above."
[..]
> It could be ok if that
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> It use the word "should", not "must", so I interpret as: "Be inclusive,
> do not add *unnecessary* restriction on age".
While that is a good interpretation, being explicit could help avoid
arguments over which interpretation is the most v
Hello Enrico,
On 04.03.2015 13:08, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed in http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml, that is required to
> be accepted by speakers in DebConf, that is still says "All presentation
> material should be suitable for people aged 12 and above."
It use the word "sho
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Because many of the things that I treasure most in my life might be
> considered by some people unsuitable for an audience of 12, I
> considerably limited the scope of my social interactions in Portland,
> limiting myself to only discuss techni
Hello,
I noticed in http://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml, that is required to
be accepted by speakers in DebConf, that is still says "All presentation
material should be suitable for people aged 12 and above."
I would like that bit to be clarified, for two reasons:
1. last year that rule was
14 matches
Mail list logo
