also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-17 12:03 +0200]:
> I fully agree. This means that the governance model of the orga
> team should be discussed first, and the outcome influences the
> association.
Feel free to spearhead this endeavour from now on. However, please
do not keep us from organising D
also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-17 09:25 +0200]:
> If all persons who disagree with the board is expelled before, the
> assembly could consist of only very few people. I had seen that
> before, such a situation is not nice.
In the case of an expulsion, the person voted on should IMHO *not*
hav
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I even think using your by-law is a good starting point, and only
> adjust what is necessary to adjust.
>
>From what I understand, madduck is working closely with German lawyers
familiar with the matter. Without having had the time to do a
* Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org) [140417 09:13]:
> But as I have already argued for the DC13 association I'm sceptical that
> separating the legal entity is the right way to achieve this. I'd prefer
> a way where the governance of the legal entity matches the governance
> model of the orga t
* martin f krafft (madd...@debconf.org) [140417 08:37]:
> also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-17 08:24 +0200]:
> > Just speaking about theoretical things, but: With your current
> > draft the board could kick out all people having a different
> > opinion, and if the general assembly would vote abou
Hi
martin f krafft writes:
>
> I never considered the association to be an umbrella for the DC15
> orga team, meaning that I didn't even consider us all becoming
> members beyond the minimal requirements. However, we also don't want
> to separate DC15 orga into members and non-members, so in th
also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-17 08:24 +0200]:
> Just speaking about theoretical things, but: With your current
> draft the board could kick out all people having a different
> opinion, and if the general assembly would vote about the appeals
> anyone who disagrees with the board cannot vote
* martin f krafft (madd...@debconf.org) [140417 08:19]:
> So yes, a whole lot of bureaucracy and legal bounds, but no
> cementation of authority.
Just speaking about theoretical things, but: With your current draft
the board could kick out all people having a different opinion, and if
the general
Folks,
The point was made that a DC15 legal entity with bylaws and people
in power might slant the way we work together and cause situations
of authoritarian behaviour or abuse of power.
I would like to clarify that the highest body in the association
we're proposing is the members' assembly. It
