On wo, 2006-07-26 at 12:42 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> ..., we have more people
> involved in the general organisation atm, in the last meeting we have started
> defining how the team(s) should work and what debconfs goals are, we have a
> tighter relationsship with debian (and maybe even SPI
On wo, 2006-07-26 at 11:41 +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:11:27PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> >
> > Andreas has been doing DebConfs for several years. It's unpaid,
> > voluntary work, but it's still a *lot* of work that he has had to put in
> > to make it work at all
On wo, 2006-07-26 at 12:11 +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> This is about getting closure for DebConf6,
Indeed. It is very important to get proper closure for DC6, whatever
that means. It's also important that this remains a team effort.
During DC5 it came onto too few shoulders and at som
I'll use this email to reply and voice my opinion on this discussion.
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 23:58 +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060725 23:21]:
>
> > I am sure there are people who disagree with that, but then it is
> > my perception that count
On wo, 2006-07-12 at 21:27 +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Another note regarding something from Aschwin:
>
> Aschwin van der Woude wrote on 12/07/2006 10:39:
> >* Treasurer (one person)
> >Preferably somebody from the local team. This person will take
> >
On wo, 2006-07-12 at 13:58 +0300, Aschwin van der Woude wrote:
> On wo, 2006-07-12 at 11:31 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > So my proposal is: gather friday on IRC at the time you proposed to decide
> > the
> > date for an meeting. Additionally people can use
On wo, 2006-07-12 at 11:58 +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> As I understood Ganneffs mail (and in there an idea aba and I discussed
> with stockholm back in .mx), that's what he is proposing: A team in a
> team.
>
> Nota bene: It's the same you are proposing, just that he had four
> members as
Ah, and as mentioned already:
* Sponsorship dude (one person or team)
Takes care of gathering money. A task not to underestimated and
crucial to a successful debconf.
On wo, 2006-07-12 at 11:39 +0300, Aschwin van der Woude wrote:
> On di, 2006-07-11 at 23:29 +0200, Joerg Jasp
On di, 2006-07-11 at 23:29 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> So, for areas and people out there which I propose, in no particular
> order, for this (and whatever i missed - please add):
>
> - Technic, Admin & Co:
> Joerg Jaspert (Ganneff)
>
> - Talks & similar:
> Alexander Schmehl
> But I do agree such experiences should lead to inequality in decision
Uh should *not* lead to inequality
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
Hi,
While I understand the concerns, I think this is the worst possible
solution.
The meeting should be open for all, and perhaps using the simple rules
of conduct outlined in the email from Holger.
I am sure together we can figure out ways not to have our Debconf
meetings explode as the previou
On za, 2006-07-08 at 07:43 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> You already achieved a big success, Safir, by turning something which
> I personnally was considering as the "dream by one man" to a team
> approach and a very valuable proposition.
I fully agree with Christian, you have done a hell of j
On zo, 2006-07-09 at 19:02 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> (BTW, I'm not too happy with this delegation based system what we have this
> time as it already led to what I feared it would lead to: some people are
> more important and equal than others. I liked it, when I (maybe wrongly) had
> the im
On za, 2006-07-08 at 10:39 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> One of the things that's confusing me about the bidding this year is
> the "do or die" attitude that we seem to have gotten to; I've heard
> suggestions from both teams now that if they don't get DebConf 7 they're
> going to give up and not t
14 matches
Mail list logo
