On 07/16/2015 08:49 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Zlatan Todoric [2015-07-16 20:28
> +0200]:
>>> 1. to differentiate it from a free offering, since — and we
>>> all know this — something that's free cannot be as good as
>>> something that one has to pay money for.
>>
>> Well, not al
Zlatan Todoric writes:
> On 07/16/2015 06:55 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
>
>>
>> 1. to differentiate it from a free offering, since — and we all
>> know this — something that's free cannot be as good as something
>> that one has to pay money for.
>
> Well, not all. You see, I am a Debian user a
also sprach Zlatan Todoric [2015-07-16 20:28 +0200]:
> > 1. to differentiate it from a free offering, since — and we all
> >know this — something that's free cannot be as good as
> >something that one has to pay money for.
>
> Well, not all. You see, I am a Debian user and although it
> p
On 07/16/2015 06:55 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> 1. to differentiate it from a free offering, since — and we all
> know this — something that's free cannot be as good as something
> that one has to pay money for.
Well, not all. You see, I am a Debian user and although it primarily
is Free
also sprach Bernelle Verster [2015-07-16 15:48 +0200]:
> For what it's worth, bearing in mind that I am new to DebConf,
> I think this is a good idea, and I would like to know more about
> how the first workshop went, and if it happens again in August,
> how that one went.
The first workshop was
Bernelle,
On 16/07/15 15:48, Bernelle Verster wrote:
> Stating explicitly that this is independent is needed, just to cover
> bases. On the other hand I see no problem with it being associated
> with DebConf. It's Debian associated, and a conference-related
> activity.
Indeed, and that's why I s
On 14/07/15 18:21, martin f krafft wrote:
> This was well received
> and we've been planning to repeat the offering just before
> DebConf15. I've mentioned this numerous times in the past, but now
> we've finally made a move.
I have missed these discussions, can you please refer me to them?
--
Hi
For what it's worth, bearing in mind that I am new to DebConf, I think
this is a good idea, and I would like to know more about how the first
workshop went, and if it happens again in August, how that one went.
(I have not replied privately before)
My thoughts:
Stating explicitly that this is
On 16/07/15 14:57, martin f krafft wrote:
> Oh? I wasn't aware of this opinion of "DebConf", and I've received
> two private replies so far from orga team members who thought the
> idea was great and who offered their support.
Sadly, I did not see them. Ask them to speak up publicly then, and we
c
also sprach Martín Ferrari [2015-07-16 14:45 +0200]:
> I already feel pretty disappointed that this is happening in such
> proximity to DebConf (and specially DebCamp), and therefore being
> implicitly associated with the conference. We can't stop you from
> doing it, but DebConf has nothing to do
On 14/07/15 18:21, martin f krafft wrote:
> All of the organisation is independent of DebConf15 (i.e. finances
> are separate, we've booked a room with the hostel, etc.), but we're
> obviously hoping to advertise this in the context of DebConf15.
While this workshop might be very useful for the b
11 matches
Mail list logo
