also sprach Bernelle Verster <bernel...@gmail.com> [2015-07-16 15:48 +0200]: > For what it's worth, bearing in mind that I am new to DebConf, > I think this is a good idea, and I would like to know more about > how the first workshop went, and if it happens again in August, > how that one went.
The first workshop was interesting for all involved parties, including ourselves, but we went into it without much of a goal or vision. Part of the motivation Michael and I had for our offering in the DC15 context was to take lessons for Debian away with us (think: certification, other offerings relevant to the corporate/professional user). Our first workshop wasn't Debian-specific, but for this one, we wanted to specifically engage the participants in discussions about what Debian could improve. > Why is the fee required? Obviously to cover costs, … yes, and there are (were) two other components: 1. to differentiate it from a free offering, since — and we all know this — something that's free cannot be as good as something that one has to pay money for. 2. to raise funds for DebConf. > This would have been better received if it was communicated in > detail to the wider team earlier - which we should address for > future cases. Fully agreed, the communications strategy wasn't optimal. I was under time pressure as I thought this would be a good addition to the press release. And I naïvely didn't expect such resistance from within the team. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team