On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 09:56:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 21:31 +0100]:
> > > What about the list of presenters/organisers?
> >
> > Currently the submitter of the event is the drafter(owner) of the event,
> > we need to make sure if summit can handle
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 09:56:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 21:31 +0100]:
> > > What about the list of presenters/organisers?
> >
> > Currently the submitter of the event is the drafter(owner) of the event,
> > we need to make sure if summit can handle
David Bremner writes:
> Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes:
>
>> Fine then.
>>
>> Can we have a word from bursaries team on this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> The bursaries team has not yet been formally constituted, so can't
> really make policy pronouncements.
>
> A group of us are in the process of putting to
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:27:23PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
> wrote:
> > I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS
> > already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to
> > me it woul
Hi Brian,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:57:13PM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:31 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Richard Hartmann [2015-01-21
> > 20:27 +0100]:
> >> > I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS
> >> > already exists and
Hi martin (2015.01.21_21:31:55_+0200)
> > I would prefer if we had an actual package, but a pseudo one will do
> > fine for now.
>
> While it would be good to have summit in Debian, of course, you
> would also want to have a place to track DebConf-specific issues.
+1 to the BTS, and yes, a summit
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:31 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Richard Hartmann [2015-01-21 20:27
> +0100]:
>> > I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS
>> > already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to
>> > me it would be a good f
also sprach Richard Hartmann [2015-01-21 20:27
+0100]:
> > I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS
> > already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to
> > me it would be a good fit.
>
> I would prefer if we had an actual package, but a pseud
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS
> already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to
> me it would be a good fit.
I would prefer if we had an actual package, but a pseudo o
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:39:12AM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:44:38PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach René Mayorga [2015-01-20 19:50 +0100]:
> > > 1) Title
> ...
> > > 7) Notes to Content team (New requested type)
> >
> > What about the list of
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 07:56:31PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [2015-01-21 19:18 +0100]:
>
> Honestly, I don't think we need a team discussion. This should be
> the infrastructure team's decision just like upstream choses the
> BTS/issue tracker for their sof
also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [2015-01-21 19:18 +0100]:
> I propose to wait 1 week for discussion. If there is consensus that this
> is a good idea I'll take the action item to request the psuedo-package
> from the BTS admins, pointing to this thread as rationale and evidence
> of team support
I propose we use a psuedo-package in the BTS for summit isues. The BTS
already exists and is a central piece of Debian culture, so it seems to
me it would be a good fit.
I find it confusing and difficult to use the wiki[0] to track bugs and
development requests for summit. Determining who made a p
also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2015-01-21 10:03 +0100]:
> And the mail thread went about sponsored people. The original
> topic was "DC15 - Prices and deals for non-sponsored attendees",
> so *non-sponsored* attendees.
Oh, the food for non-sponsored (i.e. self-paying) attendees who stay
at the ve
On 20.01.2015 19:31, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2015-01-19 16:04 +0100]:
>> - We need the lunch and dinner costs for non-hosted attendees.
>
> Each meal will be about 7€.
>
> Just for the record, I am not much in favour for catering to
> externals. The youth hostel h
also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [2015-01-21 06:39 +0100]:
> Do you mean the list that an event proposer/creator gets to choose
> from to select Participants?
>
> I recall some were concerned about this exposing the list of
> attendees.
How about letting others sign up for events and then the o
also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki [2015-01-21 06:27 +0100]:
> To my thinking, ad-hoc is not an attribute of an event, but of the
> combination of time slot and room into which it might be scheduled. In
> summit-speak, I think we should make a new Ad-hoc type of a Slot. It is
> probably possible to
17 matches
Mail list logo
