also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <e...@zhevny.com> [2015-01-21 19:18 +0100]: > I propose to wait 1 week for discussion. If there is consensus that this > is a good idea I'll take the action item to request the psuedo-package > from the BTS admins, pointing to this thread as rationale and evidence > of team support. If there is no response or significant disagreement, I > suggest it be added to the 2015-02-02 meeting agenda.
Honestly, I don't think we need a team discussion. This should be the infrastructure team's decision just like upstream choses the BTS/issue tracker for their software. That said, I think the proposal is sane and would rather see it done sooner than later, unless of course there are good arguments against it. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16: Cape Town or Montreal? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
