Re: [Debconf-team] PSU Network Requirements

2014-06-04 Thread Richard Hartmann
Can they route prefixes? Getting temporary PI would be an option, but I don't know how to get those with ARIN. Can they drop an essid on a distinct vlan from their Wi-Fi infra? Could we/they add APs to their controller if we need more coverage? Same vlan could be used for wired. Richard Sent b

[Debconf-team] PSU Network Requirements

2014-06-04 Thread Kees Cook
Hi, I talked on the phone today with the head of the PSU network. I can't say I have good news at all. They don't want us setting up our own wifi network because it will collide with theirs. The /16 they'd mentioned is for their entire campus, not just for our conference. Their guest wifi network

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf14 Bursaries Team: update

2014-06-04 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Steve, On 03/06/14 09:18, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:28:06AM -0700, Felipe van de Wiel wrote: >> All emails about travel, food and accommodation sponsorship were >> sent in the last few hours. > > Thanks very much for han

Re: [Debconf-team] DebConf 14 registration/alioth create new account problem

2014-06-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:37:16AM +0700, Kitt Tientanopajai wrote: > I tried to create a new account on alioth to register DebConf14 on May > 31, but did not receive any confirmation mail from alioth. I mailed > to registrat...@debconf.org but they told me that they could not do > much help sinc

Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-04 Thread Patty Langasek
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:38:36PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > So, yes, if we have to decide between three days of mostly-hackning > (read: What was previously known as DebCamp) and three days of > mostly-conference (read: What was previously known as DebConf), I > think the point pushed by the lo

Re: [Debconf-team] A proposal about scheduling for DC14

2014-06-04 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 07:40:12AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > Are you both saying we should go with Steve's original suggestion: > > http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20131001.175026.0a50b91b.en.html I would probably swap Thursday and Friday but in the interest of not discussing it I