(moving to debconf-team@)
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:01:49PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 03/10/2010 07:02 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Also, I would suggest having public comments on the proposed tracks - it
> > is a big change for Debconf, and what I see at the end of
> > http://wiki.
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Biella,
>
> On Donnerstag, 11. März 2010, Gabriella Coleman wrote:
>> You can see the current call for contributions here
>> (http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/CallForContributions) as well as
>> a glossary of terms (http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/TalkGlossar
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 06:25:15PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm impressed by and happy about your preparations to get awesome
> talks^wevents at DebConf10! IMO your work is a great improvement compared to
> previous events!
+1
Andreas
--
http://fam-tille.de
__
Hi Biella,
On Donnerstag, 11. März 2010, Gabriella Coleman wrote:
> You can see the current call for contributions here
> (http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/CallForContributions) as well as
> a glossary of terms (http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/TalkGlossary).
the glossary still speaks
Hi,
The local based talk team with consultation/inpspiration from some
non-local folks (Martin Kraft, Michael Bank) have decided that we would
like to include "tracks" as part of our call for contributions.
You can see the current call for contributions here
(http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf1
Hi,
The local based talk team with consultation/inpspiration from some
non-local folks (Martin Kraft, Michael Bank) have decided that we would
like to include "tracks" as part of our call for contributions.
You can see the current call for contributions here
(http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf1
Hi Al,
On Donnerstag, 4. März 2010, Al Meer, Abdulaziz wrote:
> I am interested to attend DebConf for this year and I know it costs $650
> for registration, but If I couldn't make it after I register is it possible
> to refund my fees, if I notify you ahead of time? I am worried that I will
> have
