Re: [Debconf-team] Names for events (was: Re: Open Day talks)

2009-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53:24PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > I'm not completely happy with any of the proposals (including mine). > > Neither :-/ Seems to be hard to really find a clue to name levels. > Possibly we should just do away with the levels for next > year? IMHO a *solution* will

Re: [Debconf-team] Names for events (was: Re: Open Day talks)

2009-06-30 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Richard Darst dijo [Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:24:01PM -0400]: > The primary advantages of being "official"/"featured"/"primary" are: > > - priority in scheduling (try to avoid conflicts) > - counts more for travel sponsorship > - (not this year) priority in videoing > - more emphasis on being in the

Re: [Debconf-team] Formal Dinner

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Darst
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:39:11PM +0200, Anto Recio wrote: > > I found a very nice restaurant where we can all sit and have a good > dinner price 20-22 € > > opinions please I suppose the main question here is would the formal dinner be better in: - a fancy restaurant (perhaps with some of th

Re: [Debconf-team] Day Trip--preferences

2009-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:42:51AM +0200, Anto Recio wrote: > Choose your preferences for day Trip > > http://doodle.com/i643df52havyzqhe Is there an option to have both in case there is no real majority for one option - say one bus goes to the city and the other to the nature? IIt seems that cu

[Debconf-team] Formal Dinner

2009-06-30 Thread Anto Recio
I found a very nice restaurant where we can all sit and have a good dinner price 20-22 € opinions please ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team

Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf-discuss] SPEAKERS!!! check your talk(s)

2009-06-30 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
2009/6/30 Andreas Tille : > 2009/6/30 David Reyes Samblas Martinez : >> Ok I see, mmm ... >> I believe is a little bit late to start so I guess if it's possible to >> start   earlier , I don't see any scheduled event on that room in the >> afternoon so starting let's say at 15:00 will be better for

Re: [Debconf-team] Keynotes and group photo

2009-06-30 Thread Aigars Mahinovs
2009/6/28 Andreas Tille : > 2009/6/28 Aigars Mahinovs : >> I like this idea. Usually people have no problem taking 5-10 minutes >> out of food time for the photo. And I will look for a place and >> measure light the previous days, like I did in the past years, so that >> the shooting time itself ca

Re: [Debconf-team] Keynotes and group photo

2009-06-30 Thread Aigars Mahinovs
2009/6/28 Ana Guerrero : > Even easier: > Let's schedule the photo on the 28th without time, then Aigars has 3 days > (24-26) to find a good spot and look at the best time for good lighting. > An on the 27th, we send a mail to debconf-announce with the time/place of the > picture. I like this idea

Re: [Debconf-team] Names for events (was: Re: Open Day talks)

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Darst
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:15:31AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Richard Darst [2009.06.30.0912 +0200]: > > - Featured DebConf Talks > > - Secondary DebConf Talks > > Why do we separate between them? Doesn't this suggest a level of > "inferiority" of secondary talks? What's the bene

Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf-discuss] SPEAKERS!!! check your talk(s)

2009-06-30 Thread Rafael Campos
Hi all, On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > 2009/6/30 David Reyes Samblas Martinez : >> When I first fill up the penta info for the event I have pointed this >> was a full day event, and nobody has point me this was not possible at >> debconf, > > It might be a good idea to wri

Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf-discuss] SPEAKERS!!! check your talk(s)

2009-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
2009/6/30 David Reyes Samblas Martinez : > When I first fill up the penta info for the event I have pointed this > was a full day event, and nobody has point me this was not possible at > debconf, It might be a good idea to write some e-mail to debconf-team to point out such specific needs. Chanc

Re: [Debconf-team] hardware from junta

2009-06-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi César, On Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009, César Gómez Martín wrote: > I will write an email again... gracias! :-) regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lis

Re: [Debconf-team] hardware from junta

2009-06-30 Thread César Gómez Martín
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Cesar, > > any news/update on this? Hello. We are still waiting for a response. Shit happens!!! :( I will write an email again... ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org

Re: [Debconf-team] [Debconf-discuss] SPEAKERS!!! check your talk(s)

2009-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
2009/6/30 David Reyes Samblas Martinez : > Ok I see, mmm ... > I believe is a little bit late to start so I guess if it's possible to > start   earlier , I don't see any scheduled event on that room in the > afternoon so starting let's say at 15:00 will be better for the > Rafael, the technician. W

Re: [Debconf-team] hardware from junta

2009-06-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Cesar, any news/update on this? The complete list is now available at http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf9/JuntaHW thanks & regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Debconf-team mailing lis

Re: [Debconf-team] Names for events (was: Re: Open Day talks)

2009-06-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Richard Darst [2009.06.30.0912 +0200]: > - Featured DebConf Talks > - Secondary DebConf Talks Why do we separate between them? Doesn't this suggest a level of "inferiority" of secondary talks? What's the benefit, other than sponsorship? -- .''`. martin f. krafft : :' : DebConf

Re: [Debconf-team] Names for events (was: Re: Open Day talks)

2009-06-30 Thread Richard Darst
Hi, On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:23:10PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > martin f krafft dijo [Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:44:33PM +0200]: > > "Secondary" sends a clear message. An alternative might be e.g. > > "blue" and "green" (or "yellow" and "red" or whatever), or if > > possible, the division between