I think more guidance for the teams involved would be helpful. The
Debconf and Debian CoC statements are too difficult to amend. The DC
and Debian teams should develop a process document which those
responsible would use to guide their actions.
That document should:
* Give some examples of beh
Hola Oliver Propst!
> Why not use the wiki for general feedback and maybe use the mail
> address as an option or for more sensitive feedback?
It's hard for a wiki to represent how many people agree with a certain idea.
For example, the new format that was tried this year.
It's easier, if you rec
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:29:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think more guidance for the teams involved would be helpful. The
> Debconf and Debian CoC statements are too difficult to amend. The DC
> and Debian teams should develop a process document which those
> responsible would use to guid
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:29:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think more guidance for the teams involved would be helpful. The
> Debconf and Debian CoC statements are too difficult to amend. The DC
> and Debian teams should develop a process document which those
> responsible would use to guid
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:29:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think more guidance for the teams involved would be helpful. The
> Debconf and Debian CoC statements are too difficult to amend. The DC
> and Debian teams should develop a process document which those
> responsible would use to guid
On 08/25/2014 12:43 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:46:13PM -0700, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On 08/23/2014 08:43 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>>> Are you interested in opportunistic, configuration-free encryption as a
>>> countermeasure to pervasive monitoring? have y
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:29:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think more guidance for the teams involved would be helpful. The
> Debconf and Debian CoC statements are too difficult to amend. The DC
> and Debian teams should develop a process document which those
> responsible would use to guid
Zenaan Harkness writes:
> More facts trickle out. Thank you for stepping up to the plate.
> Any chance someone could crush an egg shell already and just post a link
> to the brouhaha? Or summarise the events?
> Are we that timid, that dominated by the almighty COC, that facts are no
> longer po
Hi Richard,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> the first videos are now online and ready for your consumption:
> http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/
One of the things I wanted to address post-DebConf14 is to make sure the
event
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:14:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
>
> > the first videos are now online and ready for your consumption:
>
> > http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/
>
also sprach Patty Langasek [2014-09-03 16:57 -0700]:
> The way this particular Code of Conduct Violation Complaint was
> handled was entirely my fault.
I don't think there is any point in thinking about fault here. Go
ahead and disagree with me, but the more important thing for me is
that we lear
I should preface this by saying that I personally don't feel that strongly
about this one way or the other. But it came up in another forum that
isn't the right place to talk about it, and I've been trying to make a
point of doing my part to move some of those conversations to a better
location.
On 9/4/14, Patty Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:29:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> I think more guidance for the teams involved would be helpful. The
>> Debconf and Debian CoC statements are too difficult to amend. The DC
>> and Debian teams should develop a process document whic
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:10:29PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
>
> > the first videos are now online and ready for your consumption:
>
> > http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2014/debconf14/
>
> One of
On 9/4/14, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness writes:
>
>> More facts trickle out. Thank you for stepping up to the plate.
>
>> Any chance someone could crush an egg shell already and just post a link
>> to the brouhaha? Or summarise the events?
>
>> Are we that timid, that dominated by the al
Hello all,
I would like to ask to remove the "Do not photograph me" checkbox in
Debconf registration form as we do not really have a technology to
implement that.
While I understand and sympathize with privacy concerns that people
have in regards to their photos showing up online, there is curren
16 matches
Mail list logo
