On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:29:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think more guidance for the teams involved would be helpful. The
> Debconf and Debian CoC statements are too difficult to amend. The DC
> and Debian teams should develop a process document which those
> responsible would use to guide their actions.
The way this particular Code of Conduct Violation Complaint was handled was
entirely my fault. Antiharassement received the complaint, and I forwarded
it on to lea...@debian.org because the requested concessions were beyond the
scope of the antiharassment team to handle (we do not issue blanket
statements on behalf of debian). I did not reply to Ian to let him know that
his complaint had been received and forwarded to the appropriate people in
the timely manner that I would expect for a complaint to antiharassment, and
I accept full responsibility for that. I am very sorry.
I was mistaken in thinking that the two followup conversations I had with
Ian indicating his complaint had been received (and forwarded on to
lea...@debian.org) were sufficient in keeping him informed of the situation,
even if during one of the conversations it became clear that we did not all
agree on specifics of the situation.
I will not make that mistake again.
In the future, complaints sent to antiharassm...@debian.org should be
acknowledged by email as soon as possible, even if other parties are needed
for consultation in the matter.
Patty
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Patty Langasek
harmo...@dodds.net | harmo...@debian.org
----------------------------------------------------------
At times, you may end up far away from home;
you may not be sure of where you belong anymore.
But home is always there... because home is not a place.
It's wherever your passion takes you.
--- J. Michael Straczynski
_______________________________________________
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
