On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:47:06AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Friday 09 June 2006 23:42, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > That requirement is, of course, entirely up to the organizers. The
> > Debconf organizers have declared that all talks must be accompanied by
> > papers.
> > Of course, saying
Hi,
On Friday 09 June 2006 23:42, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> That requirement is, of course, entirely up to the organizers. The
> Debconf organizers have declared that all talks must be accompanied by
> papers.
>
> Of course, saying "give your talk as a BOF instead" is *exactly* the
> kind of behavio
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> So instead of a talk, you'd have a BOF where Enrico gives a
> presentation and everyone else listens.
Exactly, we need to find a better word. Is keynote any better?
--
.''`. Sometimes the littlest feet leave the biggest impressions
: :' :
`. `' Proudly ru
Christian Perrier wrote:
> (I CC you just to guarantee you that we're talking in your back).
I think Christian meant "to guarantee that we're *not* talking in your
back".
--
.''`. Sometimes the littlest feet leave the biggest impressions
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running unstable Deb
pe, 2006-06-09 kello 10:58 -0500, Gunnar Wolf kirjoitti:
> So, of course, Enrico's talks will always be accepted. However, being
> a fan of him as I am, I prefer them being BoFs. Why? Because talks
> require presenting a paper.
That requirement is, of course, entirely up to the organizers. The
Deb
> Actually the rationale and the process have been much more public this year.
> "Problematic talks" also have been discussed on this very list.
OK, point taken. I missed it, I guess. As usual, there's always room
for improvement and, even though Manoj and I seem to disagree, these
exchanges br
On 10680 March 1977, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Probably another possible improvement direction here.
> Hmm, unless you come with real examples and real people publicly
> complaining about the selection method, I'll remain
> sceptic(english?). These people shoud express their concerns in
> publi
On 9 Jun 2006, Christian Perrier stated:
> (Sven, nothing personal...but I've used you as an example in this
> discussion and I think it wouldn't be fair to not let you know)
>
> Manoj Srivastava wrote ("> >" is me talking):
>
> (votgin mechanism to select talks at Debconf)
>
>>> Yeah, that could
Manoj Srivastava dijo [Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:22:27AM -0500]:
> Secondly, I am not sure that going against the martket
> decision is wise, even then: popular debconf speakers do not gain
> popularity because they look like movie stars; they are popular
> because they have done seminal w
Hi,
On Friday 09 June 2006 16:51, Christian Perrier wrote:
> This is maybe what has been missing this year: more public rationale
> about the criteria used by the academic commitee to select talks. But,
> of course, this is again about volunteer work and I'd having hard
> times making a formal com
(Sven, nothing personal...but I've used you as an example in this
discussion and I think it wouldn't be fair to not let you know)
Manoj Srivastava wrote ("> >" is me talking):
(votgin mechanism to select talks at Debconf)
> > Yeah, that could be possible. I however fear that this would end up
>
On 9 Jun 2006, Christian Perrier told this:
> Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> As I said, timing could be worked on. At least the people
>> presenting the talks know they are coming, and a number of people
>> not giving talks are more or less committed by that time. However,
>> a
12 matches
Mail list logo
