Hi, On Friday 09 June 2006 16:51, Christian Perrier wrote: > This is maybe what has been missing this year: more public rationale > about the criteria used by the academic commitee to select talks. But, > of course, this is again about volunteer work and I'd having hard > times making a formal complaint about this.
Actually the rationale and the process have been much more public this year.
"Problematic talks" also have been discussed on this very list.
> Probably another possible improvement direction here.
Of course. Allways.
regards,
Holger
pgpe2MwCEMwXa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
