Dear Rene,
Thank you so much for your excellent explanation. I now understand and
agree with that the approach you have chosen is the best way for this
purpose. Yidong also told me that he has successfully implemented such
helper functions for converting a particle's several features (although
Dear Jinhyun,
It is great to hear that our implementation has been useful for you. You
are probably aware that we described the implementation in our paper here:
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018GC007508, but
there is also an earlier version of the article on Arxiv t
Dear Wolfgang,
Thanks for your answer. To be clearer, Yidong and I have been working on
the material point method (MPM) which is an offspring of the particle in
cell method. We have implemented in using deal.ii as described in our arxiv
preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00671. We are now work
On 9/13/19 1:53 AM, Yidong ZHAO wrote:
>
> I want to store some material properties in particle properties. If it's
> complicated, I think a better way is to write an interpretation function.
Yes, do the interpretation function.
I've put my thoughts into some of the documentation. See here:
Dear Wolfgang,
Thanks!
I want to store some material properties in particle properties. If it's
complicated, I think a better way is to write an interpretation function.
Best,
Yidong
>
>
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://
Yidong,
> Yes, I think *interpret* can work. Here I want to ask for a follow-up
> question: Whether it's possible(how difficult) to write a child class of
> Particle, whose property is not an array of double, but other self-defined
> types (like Tensor etc.)?
No -- the ParticleHandler actual
Dear Wolfgang,
Thanks for your prompt and clear answer!
Yes, I think *interpret* can work. Here I want to ask for a follow-up
question: Whether it's possible(how difficult) to write a child class of
Particle, whose property is not an array of double, but other self-defined
types (like Tensor e
> From the descriptions of
> Particle(https://www.dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/classParticles_1_1Particle.html)
>
> and
> PropertyPool(https://www.dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/classParticles_1_1PropertyPool.html),
>
> I know the properties of a particle should be ArrayView type
Hello all,
>From the descriptions of Particle(
https://www.dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/classParticles_1_1Particle.html)
and PropertyPool(
https://www.dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/classParticles_1_1PropertyPool.html),
I know the properties of a particle should be ArrayView type.
I
