Re: [deal.II] step-42 now available

2020-04-01 Thread Muhammad Mashhood
al strain is present as output. As the total strain is the output that is why I need here some way to evaluate the plastic and elastic strain (any one of them so that other can be evaluated from additive decomposition). If you want, you can check this interesting and simple algorithm in a deal.i

Re: [deal.II] step-42 now available

2020-04-01 Thread Andrew McBride
Hi all Classical plasticity is underpinned by return mapping algorithms that operate at the level of the quadrature point. One has a global predictor for the displacement field where we assume frozen plastic flow. Then at each quadrature point you compute a trial strain, and hence a trial stre

Re: AW: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-02-05 Thread Timo Heister
> In such a case, one wants to restart the computations We have support for snapshot&resume in parallel with adaptive meshes by using the SolutionTransfer class. See "Use for serialization" in https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.dealii.org_developer_doxygen_deal.II_classparalle

Re: AW: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-26 Thread Alberto Salvadori
Thank you, Timo. Your remarks have been very useful. It turned out that I made a mistake in the way the mesh was prepared, specifically some hanging nodes were not properly dealt with. This caused also a related issue, that I shared here some time ago (Nov. 25). This leads to another question, th

Re: AW: AW: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-22 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
I can do that for you. Do I understand correctly that the only change that needs to happen is to move active_set_old = active_set; to *after* the if-statement? Exactly. Great, thanks for confirming, Joerg! The patch is now here: https://www.dealii.org/8.5.1/doxygen/deal.II/Tutorial.htm

Re: AW: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-19 Thread Timo Heister
> in the code and re-implemented it. In serial version, all works fine so far. > However, when running in parallel, I am seeing an issue in the method > PlasticityContactProblem::update_solution_and_constraints. > > In particular, it turns out that the value of > > const unsigned int index_z = dof_

Re: AW: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-19 Thread Alberto Salvadori
Hi Wolfgang and Jörg I am taking advantage for a second question. I have made a few minor changes in the code and re-implemented it. In serial version, all works fine so far. However, when running in parallel, I am seeing an issue in the method PlasticityContactProblem::update_solution_and_constra

AW: AW: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-17 Thread Frohne, Joerg
>>On 01/17/2018 02:45 PM, Frohne, Joerg wrote: >> obviously this is a mistake. I checked the source files which we have used >> for results in corresponding paper. >> There I have found the following coding: >> >>resid_old = resid; >> >>resid_vector = system_rhs_newton; >>

Re: AW: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-17 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 01/17/2018 02:45 PM, Frohne, Joerg wrote: obviously this is a mistake. I checked the source files which we have used for results in corresponding paper. There I have found the following coding: resid_old = resid; resid_vector = system_rhs_newton; resid_vecto

AW: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-17 Thread Frohne, Joerg
pers! Joerg Von: Wolfgang Bangerth [bange...@colostate.edu] Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Januar 2018 21:48 An: dealii@googlegroups.com; Frohne, Joerg Cc: Suttmeier, Franz-Theo Betreff: Re: [deal.II] step-42 clarification On 01/16/2018 12:59 AM, Alberto Salvadori wrote: >

Re: [deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-16 Thread Wolfgang Bangerth
On 01/16/2018 12:59 AM, Alberto Salvadori wrote: Dear community, I am studying with pleasure step-42 and I got a bit confused in the method PlasticityContactProblem::solve_newton. At the very end of it, we find these instructions: old_active_set = active_set; previous_residual_norm = residua

[deal.II] step-42 clarification

2018-01-16 Thread Alberto Salvadori
Dear community, I am studying with pleasure step-42 and I got a bit confused in the method PlasticityContactProblem::solve_newton. At the very end of it, we find these instructions: old_active_set = active_set; previous_residual_norm = residual_norm; if (Utilities::MPI::sum

[deal.II] Step-42

2017-05-14 Thread benhour . amirian66
Dear All, I really appreciate it if you let me know how I can run step 42 because whenever I ran it, I got two error without any information about that. This is exactly the same with "goal oriented mesh adaptivity in elastoplasticity proiblems" example which is written by Shahram. Looking forwar

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-08-03 Thread Daniel Arndt
Ehsan, Good that you found the error. Another possibility is to use ccmake. This works for me quite well. Best, Daniel Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2016 11:37:14 UTC+2 schrieb Ehsan: > > Finally I found the problem after installing and uninstalling for more > than ten times. > The problem was the sp

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-08-03 Thread Ehsan
Finally I found the problem after installing and uninstalling for more than ten times. The problem was the space after "=" !! There should be NO space before and after "=" in setting cmake variable. On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:49:56 PM UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > > Dear Eshan, > > Some

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-08-01 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
Dear Eshan, Sometimes it is necessary to manually remove CMakeCache.txt before reconfiguring a project. Can you try to do this and see if you have any further success? Regards, J-P On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:42:25 PM UTC+2, Ehsan wrote: > > Dear Daniel, > I checked the "detailed.log" file

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-08-01 Thread Ehsan
Dear Daniel, I checked the "detailed.log" file and noticed that DEAL_II_WITH_MPI, DEAL_II_WITH_P4EST and DEAL_II_WITH_TRILINOS all three are off. my cmake is: cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/General_for_All_Users/deal_II_install_dir -DDEAL_II_WITH_64BIT_INDICES= ON -DDEAL_II_WITH_MPI= ON -D

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-08-01 Thread Ehsan
Dear Daniel, When I run cmake in terminal and the end I receive below warning: CMake Warning: Manually-specified variables were not used by the project: P4EST_DIR TRILINOS_DIR How should I solve this problem. Best regards. Ehsan On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:21:31 PM UTC+2, Ehsan wr

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-08-01 Thread Ehsan
Dear Daniel, In the "detailed.log" the "CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:" is empty but I am sure that I defined it in cmake: I have a generat question. is it possible to compile deal ii with enabled Trilinos, P4EST, and MPI options? Best regards. Ehsan On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 at 8:52:36 PM UTC+2, D

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-07-27 Thread Daniel Arndt
Ehsan, can you show us what your "detailed.log" in the build directory looks like? This file stores the configuration that is used for building deal.II. ` -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX= /home/General_for_All_Users/deal_II_install_dir` should tell deal.II to copy the build library into that folder when y

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-07-27 Thread Ehsan
Dear Toby, Thanks for your reply. I deleted folder of my previous deal ii installation and installed it again and now I faced two other problems. Can you please help me solve them: First: previously when I installed deal-ii without MPI, Trilinos and P4EST options and addresse deall-ii to be in

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-07-27 Thread Ehsan
Dear Toby, Thanks for your reply. I deleted folder of my previous deal ii installation and installed it again and now I faced two other problems. Can you please help me solve them: First: previously when I installed deal-ii without MPI, Trilinos and P4EST options and addresse deall-ii to be ins

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-07-27 Thread Tobi Young
Ehsan. Yes, but that is not what you have done. ;-) Look at the configure script in your first email again calmly and *very carefully* and then look at my reply calmly and *very carefully*. In the configure script you sent us, you are missing a D on two lines, which I am guessing is stopping c

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-07-27 Thread Ehsan
Hi, Moreover I have 2 more problems. First: previously when I installed deal-ii without MPI, Trilinos and P4EST options and addresse deall-ii to be installed ins a specific directory with -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX= /home/General_for_All_Users/deal_II_install_dir option, it was installed in the

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-07-27 Thread Ehsan
Dear Toby, But in below links they are -DDEAL_II_With_... https://www.dealii.org/developer/readme.html https://www.dealii.org/developer/external-libs/p4est.html Best, Ehsan On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 at 12:19:07 PM UTC+2, Tobi Young wrote: > > Hello Eshan, > > Perhaps here is your error. It

Re: [deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-07-27 Thread Tobi Young
Hello Eshan, Perhaps here is your error. It is a simple typo. ;-) > -DEAL_II_WITH_P4EST= ON > -DEAL_II_WITH_TRILINOS= ON Should be: -DDEAL_II_WITH_P4EST= ON -DDEAL_II_WITH_TRILINOS= ON Please check that the output (or configure.log) says it has found a

[deal.II] Step-42 -- Problem with Trilinos and P4EST

2016-07-27 Thread Ehsan
Hello, I want to run Step-42 but I receive below error: Error! The deal.II library found at / was not configured with DEAL_II_WITH_MPI = ON DEAL_II_WITH_P4EST = ON DEAL_II_WITH_TRILINOS = ON One or all of these are OFF in your installation but are required for this tutorial