Dear all,
To complete this topic for both MappingQGeneric and MappingFEField, I am
wondering if it is possible to extract the quadrature in the reference
element in the function maybe_update_Jacobians and maybe_compute_q_points?
These are needed to ensure that the normals are consistent at each
Dear Martin or whom it may concern,
I have solved the previous problem and am confirming that the conservative
curl form has now been implemented and passes 2 complicated tests for GCL
on symmetric and non-symmetric curvilinear grids for different polynomial
degrees. Turns out that we did not n
Dear Martin,
As an update, I figured out a way to have it work in 3D without needing to
use another Evaluate call. The only issue is that I need the quadrature in
the reference element since I construct an FE_DQGArbitraryNodes to evaluate
the derivative (I do this since the metric Jacobian is i
Dear Martin,
I would like to start by thanking you for all of your help. Here is a link
to my fork: https://github.com/AlexanderCicchino/dealii
It is not fully working yet, I need your help for the "evaluate" as you
mentioned earlier. I have been trying multiple different ways but cannot
seem t
Dear Alex,
Great! I would suggest to start by simply adding new code to the
maybe_update_q_points_Jacobians_... function with the option to turn it
off or on. Depending on how the final implementation will look like we
might want to move that to a separate place, but I think it will be less
r
Dear Martin,
Thank you very much! I have been working on making the test case not depend
on our in house flowsolver's functions.
I think that implementing Eq. 36 the "conservative curl" form would be
sufficient.
Yes this procedure sounds perfect to me, and I agree with the dimension of
the ob
Dear Alex,
Great! The first thing we need to know is the equation. I had a quick
look in the paper by Kopriva and I think we want to use either equation
(36) or (37), depending on whether we consider the conservative or
invariant curl form, respectively. In either case, it appears that we
nee
Dear Martin,
Thank you for your response. Yes I agree that only some local computations
are necessary to implement the identities.
Yes I would be interested in this feature and trying to implement it. Do
you have any suggestions on where I should start and overall practices I
should follow?
Th
Dear Alex,
This has been on my list of things to implement and verify with deal.II
over a range of examples for quite a while, so I'm glad you bringing the
topic up. It is definitely true that our way to define Jacobians does
not take those identities into account, but I believe we should add
Thank you for responding Wolfgang Bangerth.
The GCL condition comes from the discretized scheme satisfying free-stream
preservation. I will demonstrate this for 2D below, (can be interpreted for
spectral, DG, finite difference, finite volume etc):
Consider the conservation law: \frac{\partial W}
Alexander,
I am wondering if anybody has also found that the inverse of the Jacobian from
FE Values, with MappingQGeneric does not satisfy the Geometric Conservation
Law (GCL), in the sense of:
Kopriva, David A. "Metric identities and the discontinuous spectral element
method on curvilinea
Hello,
I am wondering if anybody has also found that the inverse of the Jacobian
from FE Values, with MappingQGeneric does not satisfy the Geometric
Conservation Law (GCL), in the sense of:
Kopriva, David A. "Metric identities and the discontinuous spectral element
method on curvilinear meshes
12 matches
Mail list logo
