Re: [deal.II] Biharmonic equation with periodic BCs

Lucas: these two tutorials, I didn't see anything about periodic boundary conditions, however. Two potential ways I can think to enforce periodic boundary conditions would be (in 1D, for notational simplicity): 1. u(0) = u(L), du/dx (0) = du/dx (L) 2. u(0) = u(L), d^2 u/dx^2 (0) = d^2 u/d

Re: [deal.II] Higher order Tetrahedron support for gmsh

On 3/20/23 12:26, Kumar Saurabh wrote: I wanted to check if deal.ii has a support for second order tetrahedron meshes. I tried to load the file from GMSH and it gave the error for unsupported element type. Is it that deal.ii do not support second order tetrahedron from GMSH or do not suppor

[deal.II] Biharmonic equation with periodic BCs

Hi folks, Given the explanations in step-47 and step-82 , it appears that the particular boundary conditions associated with the biharmonic equation can make it relatively easy to

[deal.II] Higher order Tetrahedron support for gmsh

Hi, I wanted to check if deal.ii has a support for second order tetrahedron meshes. I tried to load the file from GMSH and it gave the error for unsupported element type. Is it that deal.ii do not support second order tetrahedron from GMSH or do not support second order tetrahedron at all? T

[deal.II] Re: Fully distributed triangulation with GMSH

Hi Bruno, Thanks for the suggestion. It seems to be working fine. Thanks, Kumar Saurabh On Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 7:23:06 PM UTC-7 blais...@gmail.com wrote: > Dear Kumar, > > You can monitor the processes using your OS to verify that. > If you are loading a relatively large triangulation, t

dealii@googlegroups.com

On 3/19/23 15:47, Laryssa Abdala wrote: I've tried using different versions of boost, but have not been successful with any. I've attached the detailed.log if anyone could help me. Laryssa, I don't know specifically what causes this error, but you can almost certainly avoid it if you use th