On 2/11/22 09:54, Ali Seddiq wrote:
Thanks very much for your advice. I definitely should and will follow that.
But may I still narrow my question for a clarification (with upcoming
complexity), and as a quick question ask if adding the boundary term through
cell_rhs +=... (as above, and very
Syed,
the error message is not particularly good, but I think what is happening is
that you are passing in a fully distributed vector to a function that expects
a vector that has ghost elements for locally relevant but not locally owned
elements.
Best
W.
On 2/11/22 07:40, syed ansari wrot
On 2/11/22 12:12, 'Markus Mehnert' via deal.II User Group wrote:
*** Caution: EXTERNAL Sender ***
Dear Wolfgang,
Thank you for your quick response. The dofs per face are defined as /
/
/
/
/const unsigned int dofs_per_face = fe_cell.dofs_per_face;/
/
/
where fe_cell is the/FESystem/ that consis
On 2/14/22 15:35, Joss G. wrote:
**
Thank you for your answer. I am trying to substitute my
PETScWrappers::MPI::Vector
for parallel::distributed::Vector (locally_relevant_solution and
system_rhs) but my lac library does not contain the filee
*deal.II/lac/parallel_vector.h. *I even tried to
Thank you for your answer. I am trying to substitute my
PETScWrappers::MPI::Vector for parallel::distributed::Vector
(locally_relevant_solution
and system_rhs) but my lac library does not contain the filee
*deal.II/lac/parallel_vector.h. *I even tried to get the latest version but
is not the
On 2/14/22 08:50, Joss G. wrote:
I am having an error when running more than 1 core (with MPI) in a similar
implementation to step-40 when using a component wise ordering:
DoFRenumbering::component_wise(dof_handler) in the setup_syste() function.
Is ii possible to do what I am trying to do
Dear all,
I am having an error when running more than 1 core (with MPI) in a similar
implementation to step-40 when using a component wise ordering:
DoFRenumbering::component_wise(dof_handler) in the setup_syste() function.
Is ii possible to do what I am trying to do?
Thank you
*Error:*
Dear Hassan,
Everything is described there:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09576
The algorithm is pretty simple. For every cell, we find the list of
possible neighbours. We define this list by looking at every cell which
shares a vertex with a cell we are presently working with. For all
particles,
Dear Bruno
That is what I am looking for. Surely its good to have them in deal.II.
Otherwise, could you please describe shortly the algorithm that you used to
do that.
Thanks,
Hassan
On Sunday, February 13, 2022 at 6:21:42 PM UTC+3:30 blais...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Dear Hassan,
> There is no
