On 2/9/21 3:20 PM, Pascal Kraft wrote:
I have a similar question: I want to couple dofs between two meshes. They have
a shared surface (shared in the sense that it is at the same location). I
assemble my system blockwise. The one mesh describes the "inner" domain I use
in multiple situations
Hi everyone,
I have a similar question: I want to couple dofs between two meshes. They
have a shared surface (shared in the sense that it is at the same
location). I assemble my system blockwise. The one mesh describes the
"inner" domain I use in multiple situations and the other mesh is a pml
David
what is the minimum number of procs this issue remains? Is it there for 2
procs?
Also, can you reduce the mesh to an absolute minimum, say 4-8 cells -- is
it still there?
Alexander
On Monday, February 8, 2021 at 10:20:35 AM UTC+1 daschn...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> > Dav
David
i believe that in order to proceed, one will have to simplify this further.
What is the minimum number of processes this happens? Can you reproduce it
for 2 procs?
Additionally, can the mesh size be reduced to a minimum (ideally a handful
of cells, say 4-8)?
Alexander
On Monday, Februa
This may be of interest to some of you here!
Forwarded Message
Subject: FYI: Argonne Training Program on Extreme-scale Computing Seeks
Applications for 2021
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:51:43 +
From: Gable, Carl
To: Wolfgang Bangerth
https://www.hpcwire.com/of
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 12:22 CST, Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> On 2/9/21 8:34 AM, Matthias Maier wrote:
>> We do not have PMLs directly available in deal.II as a building block,
>> but it is straightforward for you to write one for your needs.
>
> But step-62 uses PML boundary conditions!
Eve
On 2/9/21 8:34 AM, Matthias Maier wrote:
We do not have PMLs directly available in deal.II as a building block,
but it is straightforward for you to write one for your needs.
But step-62 uses PML boundary conditions!
Best
W.
--
Dear Anne,
We do not have PMLs directly available in deal.II as a building block,
but it is straightforward for you to write one for your needs.
I have written one for the time-harmonic Maxwell's equations (for 2D) a
while ago. It is very unpolished code, but have a look at:
https://github.co
>
> I think that this is an artifact of the way you generate the output. You
> are
> writing the same file from all processors, and so in essence what you are
> visualizing is the mesh written by the last processor that gets to write.
> But
> that includes ghost and artificial cells in the case of
On 2/9/21 7:01 AM, Ce Qin wrote:
But for another randomly refined triangulation, things become complicated.
The two triangulations are very different (see figures below).
I think that this is an artifact of the way you generate the output. You are
writing the same file from all processors, an
Hi,
I would like use deal.II for acoustic simulations. Do we have PML available in
deal.II?
Thanks
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subs
11 matches
Mail list logo
