[deal.II] Re: How to use Trilinos instead of Petsc in step-40

Hi Hamad, Can you please tell us which version of deal.II you are using, and provide us with the installation logs? Regards, J-P On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 11:51:09 PM UTC+2, Hamed Babaei wrote: > > Hi friends, > > I want to use Trilinos instead of Petsc in my parallel code which is based

[deal.II] How to use Trilinos instead of Petsc in step-40

Hi friends, I want to use Trilinos instead of Petsc in my parallel code which is based on step-40. I guess some changes should be made in the following lines of the include files part: namespace LA { #if defined(DEAL_II_WITH_PETSC) && !(defined(DEAL_II_WITH_TRILINOS) && defined(FORCE_USE_OF_TR

[deal.II] How to addapt MappingQEulerian class for Parallel codes using the PETSc wrapper classes

Hi all, Since I am solving a large strain problem, to displace my grid every time step I have used MappingQEulerian class in output part of the code(the same as step-44) as follows: Vector soln(solution.size()); for (unsig

Re: [deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

On 10/14/2016 12:45 PM, Timo Heister wrote: Documentation in the include part says : " uncomment the following #define > if you have PETSc and Trilinos installed and you prefer using Trilinos in > this example: #define FORCE_USE_OF_TRILINOS" > I can't understand what it means by the change in the

Re: [deal.II] DWARF version?

Victor, it looks like there is a problem with Trilinos: CMake Error at /work/00434/eijkhout/trilinos/installation-12.2.1/lib/cmake/STK/STKConfig.cmake:143 (INCLUDE): include could not find load file: /work/00434/eijkhout/trilinos/installation-12.2.1/lib/cmake/STK/../STKDoc_tests/STKDoc

Re: [deal.II] DWARF version?

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Timo Heister wrote: > >> The cmake aborts somewhere and I was trying to figure out where. I’m >> attaching the log and the output. > > What is the output to the terminal before it aborts? ### # # deal.II configuration: #CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE: DebugRele

Re: [deal.II] DWARF version?

> The cmake aborts somewhere and I was trying to figure out where. I’m > attaching the log and the output. What is the output to the terminal before it aborts? -- Timo Heister http://www.math.clemson.edu/~heister/ -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/fo

Re: [deal.II] Re: using .vtk file as initial condition

.vtk files are visualization output, which always involves some loss of information (for example we interpolate linearly to the vertices of each cell by default), so therefore it is complicated/inaccurate/undesirable to reconstruct a finite element solution vector from it. This is the reason nobody

Re: [deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

> Documentation in the include part says : " uncomment the following #define > if you have PETSc and Trilinos installed and you prefer using Trilinos in > this example: #define FORCE_USE_OF_TRILINOS" > I can't understand what it means by the change in the following part: You only need to change th

Re: [deal.II] Re: DWARF version?

> auto.cxx(5) (col. 11): internal error: assertion failed Lovely internal compiler error! > PS this is only a problem with Intel 15; it's solved in 16. Unfortunately > our software stack is complete for 15 and updating to 16 or 17 is slow This error is fine to have inside CmakeError I think

[deal.II] Re: DWARF version?

PS this is only a problem with Intel 15; it's solved in 16. Unfortunately our software stack is complete for 15 and updating to 16 or 17 is slow Victor. -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii

[deal.II] DWARF version?

The 8.4.1 cmake throws an error because of the "-gdwarf-2" flag on the Intel compiler. Is that flag needed? If no, how can I disable it? This is what I found in the CmakeError: Run Build Command:"/usr/bin/gmake" "cmTryCompileExec3077733329/fast" gmake[1]: Entering directory `/work/00434/eijkho

Re: [deal.II] Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably memory access out of range

Hi Daniel, I hope you are doing well. I've been struggling to run step-40 using Trilinos instead of Petsc. I appreciate it if you could let me know which parts of the code should be changed and how. Documentation in the include part says : " uncomment the following #define if you have PETSc a

[deal.II] Re: Solution Components of a Vector valued problem

Dear Lisa, You should have a look at some of the previous discussions on the use of the cell->vertex_dof_index function (as well as its documentation

[deal.II] Re: Solution Components of a Vector valued problem

Hallo, Thanks for both replies. In general, from a solution vector, how can I extract u_x, u_y, and T nodal values corresponding to a specific node? Best regards. Lisa On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 1:05:08 PM UTC+2, Lisa Collins wrote: > > Hello, > > Dealing with vector valued problems in deal

Re: [deal.II] Solution Components of a Vector valued problem

Hello, Thanks for both replies. If I define FESystem fe (FE_Q(2), dim, FE_Q(1), 1); in a mesh with 10 nodes can I say that: S[0] = u_x of node A S[1] = u_y of node A S[20] = T of node A S[2] = u_x of node B S[3] = u_y of node B S[21] = T of node B Generally I would like to find the correspondi