On 02/10/2012 07:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> how do i get these idiotic warnings mysql speaks about?
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/show-warnings.html
> why do i get "could not fetch reply_body" for every single lmtp-delivery
> independent if the user has a reply defined?
>
> mysql>
On 02/10/2012 08:35 PM, drsyst...@globalcerts.net wrote:
> mysql>show innodb status;
>
> 120210 14:15:46 Error in foreign key constraint of table
> dbmail/#sql-5c9_3ed:
>
> FOREIGN KEY (`user_idnr`) REFERENCES `dbmail_users` (`user_idnr`)
> ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE:
> Canno
Hi,
I hope thats correct.
Harald
Am 11.02.2012, 21:12 Uhr, schrieb Paul J Stevens :
On 02/10/2012 10:04 PM, ITronic Harald Leithner wrote:
Hi,
first there is an inconsistent in the create_table.sql and the upgrade
2_2-3_0.sql
in create_table the some bigint columns are not unsigned for exam
Hi Paul,
while trying to upgrade dbmail I came to the problem that I have 300.000
duplicated or tripled entries in dbmail_envelope, they have the same
physmessage_id and envelope value but with a different id values.
Can I delete the duplicated entries?
thx
Harald
_
On 02/13/2012 12:07 PM, ITronic Harald Leithner wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> while trying to upgrade dbmail I came to the problem that I have 300.000
> duplicated or tripled entries in dbmail_envelope, they have the same
> physmessage_id and envelope value but with a different id values.
>
> Can I delet
Am 13.02.2012 09:09, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> On 02/10/2012 07:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> how do i get these idiotic warnings mysql speaks about?
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/show-warnings.html
thanks, even after 10 years in business each day learning new things!
>> why do i
On 02/13/2012 01:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Incorrect datetime value: 'NOW()'
Fixed in GIT now.
--
Paul J Stevenspjstevns @ gmail, twitter, skype, linkedin
* Premium Hosting Services and Web Application Consultancy *
Am 13.02.2012 13:46, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> On 02/13/2012 01:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Incorrect datetime value: 'NOW()'
>
> Fixed in GIT now.
partly confirmed
but this did it not make it into dbmail3 :-(
https://github.com/pjstevns/dbmail/commit/f887d2e01c5a288fcd2f6ecb1639b6fb0dba203
On 02/13/2012 02:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.02.2012 13:46, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
>> On 02/13/2012 01:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Incorrect datetime value: 'NOW()'
>>
>> Fixed in GIT now.
>
> partly confirmed
>
> but this did it not make it into dbmail3 :-(
> https://github.co
Am 13.02.2012 14:41, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> On 02/13/2012 02:05 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 13.02.2012 13:46, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
>>> On 02/13/2012 01:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Incorrect datetime value: 'NOW()'
>>>
>>> Fixed in GIT now.
>>
>> partly confirmed
>>
>> but this did it
On 02/13/2012 03:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> so we have only the problem with ".cssclass" while forwarding remaining
> and a small log error below, if weg get this cleaned dbmail3 is perfect
> from my point of view
Please check your sendmail option in dbmail.conf. The code for
forwarding messag
hi
is there a really good reason dropping all foreign keys
and create them new? this queries are running a very
long time (i am testing your convert-sql this moment)
from me this feels a little to invasive, the last convertion
took in summary 1 hour, i fear this would be increased a lot now
| 2
On 02/13/2012 03:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> hi
>
> is there a really good reason dropping all foreign keys
> and create them new? this queries are running a very
> long time (i am testing your convert-sql this moment)
This script was changed to be more robust in the face of slightly
different
Am 13.02.2012 15:35, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> On 02/13/2012 03:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> is there a really good reason dropping all foreign keys
>> and create them new? this queries are running a very
>> long time (i am testing your convert-sql this moment)
>
>
> This script was
Looks better now thx.
Am 13.02.2012, 12:28 Uhr, schrieb Paul J Stevens :
On 02/13/2012 12:07 PM, ITronic Harald Leithner wrote:
Hi Paul,
while trying to upgrade dbmail I came to the problem that I have 300.000
duplicated or tripled entries in dbmail_envelope, they have the same
physmessage_id
Can you show me your create statement for dbmail_sievescripts?
Am 13.02.2012, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb Reindl Harald :
Am 13.02.2012 15:35, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
On 02/13/2012 03:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
hi
is there a really good reason dropping all foreign keys
and create them new? this qu
Hi
thank you, replies are now working as expected
forwarding is definitly broken!
Am 13.02.2012 15:20, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> On 02/13/2012 03:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> so we have only the problem with ".cssclass" while forwarding remaining
>> and a small log error below, if weg get th
AFAIK this is from Fedora 10/11 2009
maybe they have backported constraints which was
originally not there and with not exactly the same
name :-(
dbmail_sievescripts | CREATE TABLE `dbmail_sievescripts` (
`owner_idnr` bigint(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`name` varchar(100) NOT NULL,
`
schaut so aus...
I have a key called owner_idnr_2 this key is a index on owner_idnr and
name. (looks like the update from 2.0 to 2.2).
You have the same fields as unique key from 2.2.5 to 2.3.0 maybe the sql
script should be changed to consider this.
Am 13.02.2012, 16:27 Uhr, schrieb Reindl
On 02/13/2012 04:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Hi
>
> thank you, replies are now working as expected
> forwarding is definitly broken!
>
> Am 13.02.2012 15:20, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
>> On 02/13/2012 03:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> so we have only the problem with ".cssclass" while forward
Am 13.02.2012 16:50, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> On 02/13/2012 04:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> thank you, replies are now working as expected
>> forwarding is definitly broken!
>>
>> Am 13.02.2012 15:20, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
>>> On 02/13/2012 03:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
so
On 02/13/2012 04:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> but i am running the identical postfix-2.9 packages on both machines
> these are from the internal repo and the whole machine is a clone
>
> how can sendmail from postfix act different and do any change to the
> message if the only different binary i
Am 13.02.2012 16:58, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> On 02/13/2012 04:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> but i am running the identical postfix-2.9 packages on both machines
>> these are from the internal repo and the whole machine is a clone
>>
>> how can sendmail from postfix act different and do any ch
On Monday, February 13, 2012 12:28:59 PM Paul J Stevens wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 12:07 PM, ITronic Harald Leithner wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > while trying to upgrade dbmail I came to the problem that I have 300.000
> > duplicated or tripled entries in dbmail_envelope, they have the same
> > physmes
Alan Hodgson schreef:
>On Monday, February 13, 2012 12:28:59 PM Paul J Stevens wrote:
>> On 02/13/2012 12:07 PM, ITronic Harald Leithner wrote:
>> > Hi Paul,
>> >
>> > while trying to upgrade dbmail I came to the problem that I have
>300.000
>> > duplicated or tripled entries in dbmail_envelope,
On Monday, February 13, 2012 07:47:34 PM Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Alan Hodgson schreef:
> >This will happen on every upgrade to 3.0. Reported in:
> >
> >http://dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=897
>
> That bug was fixed last week.
Awesome, thanks.
___
DBmai
Hi Paul
please change the topic from "forwarding multi-mime messages broken"
to "any line starting with a dot is broken"
attached 3 files
* HTML-Source with 3 css-classes
* one time sent as plain -> appears with ".." instead "." in the MUA
* one time sent as multimime -> HTML part appears with "
Paul,
> please change the topic from "forwarding multi-mime messages broken"
> to "any line starting with a dot is broken"
>
> attached 3 files
>
> * HTML-Source with 3 css-classes
> * one time sent as plain -> appears with ".." instead "." in the MUA
> * one time sent as multimime -> HTML part
28 matches
Mail list logo