Am 13.02.2012 16:50, schrieb Paul J Stevens: > On 02/13/2012 04:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Hi >> >> thank you, replies are now working as expected >> forwarding is definitly broken! >> >> Am 13.02.2012 15:20, schrieb Paul J Stevens: >>> On 02/13/2012 03:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>>> so we have only the problem with ".cssclass" while forwarding remaining >>>> and a small log error below, if weg get this cleaned dbmail3 is perfect >>>> from my point of view >>> >>> Please check your sendmail option in dbmail.conf. The code for >>> forwarding messages is identical between dbmail2 and dbmail3, afaict. >> >> sendmail = /usr/sbin/sendmail >> /usr/sbin/sendmail“ -> „/etc/alternatives/mta >> /etc/alternatives/mta“ -> „/usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix >> >> something acts different > > Obviously, but it's not DBMail. Just been testing here on Ubuntu and > forwarding is *not* broken. > > Check the logs and grep for 'send_mail' > > Info:[message] send_mail(+2132): opening pipe to [/usr/sbin/sendmail -i > -f p...@nfg.nl p...@nfg.nl] > > The message is fed as-is to the sendmail command. The -i switch is added > to make sure sendmail doesn't do dot-stuffing
but i am running the identical postfix-2.9 packages on both machines these are from the internal repo and the whole machine is a clone how can sendmail from postfix act different and do any change to the message if the only different binary involved is dbmail?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
