[Dbmail] Auto-setting of Status Flag in dbmail_messages table

2005-09-28 Thread Dolim
When my email client checks for new mail for some test accounts that I've set up in dbmail, the status field for those checked messages are automatically set to 2 (MESSAGE_STATUS_DELETE). Is there a reason why dbmail is doing this or is it a bug? Should they be set to 1 (MESSAGE_STATUS_SEEN)?

Re: [Dbmail] Auto-setting of Status Flag in dbmail_messages table

2005-09-28 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, Unless you're running a bleeding-edge svn version and some bad code was just committed to cause this (quite unlikely), your mail client is also requesting the messages to be deleted. You could turn on log-level 5 in dbmail to see exactly what commands it's issuing, or you could watch wit

[Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd disk space ...

2005-09-28 Thread Alan Glait
I was checking my server ... so I saw /var at 92% I restart dbmail-lmtpd ... and it free to 20% ... How I can to prevent this ?? I have /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-util -cturpd -l 24h -qq in my crontab at 3AM ... thanx for any help !

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd disk space ...

2005-09-28 Thread Paul J Stevens
Alan Glait wrote: > I was checking my server ... so I saw /var at 92% > I restart dbmail-lmtpd ... and it free to 20% ... Since a lmtpd process doesn't use any diskspace to speak of, I'm guessing here: lmtpd was down, so your mailq was getting rather big. Starting up lmtpd allowed your mta

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd disk space ...

2005-09-28 Thread Alan Glait
mmm strange thing Again ... I have 99% ... I /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbmail-lmtpd.sh restart and it goes to 13% I saw pid 69622 (mysqld), uid 88 inumber 17015 on /var: filesystem full in dmesg ... so ... mysql is writing to /var ... but why ... ? ? thanx for any help Paul J Stevens wrote:

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd disk space ...

2005-09-28 Thread Paul J Stevens
Next time you see this: Before you restart lmtpd, don't mess with your crime-scene: first find out what's eating your disk. du -Sxm /var | sort -nr | head -20 should give you an indication. Alan Glait wrote: > mmm strange thing > Again ... I have 99% ... I /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbmail-lmtpd.

[Dbmail] Minimal PostgreSQL version for DBMail

2005-09-28 Thread Eugene Prokopiev
Hi, Which minimal PostgreSQL version can I use for DBMail? -- Thanks, Eugene Prokopiev

Re: [Dbmail] Minimal PostgreSQL version for DBMail

2005-09-28 Thread Leonel Nunez
Eugene Prokopiev wrote: Hi, Which minimal PostgreSQL version can I use for DBMail? -- Thanks, Eugene Prokopiev ___ Dbmail mailing list Dbmail@dbmail.org https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail I highly recommend you to keep with the

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd disk space ...

2005-09-28 Thread Alan Glait
Thanx Paul ! Its done ... I think that was the tmpdir of mysql ... I change it location .. Paul J Stevens wrote: Next time you see this: Before you restart lmtpd, don't mess with your crime-scene: first find out what's eating your disk. du -Sxm /var | sort -nr | head -20 should give you an

Re: [Dbmail] Minimal PostgreSQL version for DBMail

2005-09-28 Thread Paul J Stevens
Leonel Nunez wrote: > Eugene Prokopiev wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Which minimal PostgreSQL version can I use for DBMail? I think pretty much any version of postgresql that's not really ancient will do. dbmail sure doesn't exactly push the envelope on postgres' capabilities, and afaik the libpq api ha

Re: [Dbmail] Minimal PostgreSQL version for DBMail

2005-09-28 Thread Eric Soroos
On Sep 28, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote: Leonel Nunez wrote: Eugene Prokopiev wrote: Hi, Which minimal PostgreSQL version can I use for DBMail? I think pretty much any version of postgresql that's not really ancient will do. dbmail sure doesn't exactly push the envelope o

Re: [Dbmail] Minimal PostgreSQL version for DBMail

2005-09-28 Thread Jesse Norell
> there's very little reason not to be running one of the last couple > stable versions 7.4 or 8.0. I'll mention we saw data bloat problems (requiring a dump/reload) with some 7.3 version(s?) of postgres, and I think maybe something prior to that (7.2ish?), too. Has been fine since going to

Re: [Dbmail] Minimal PostgreSQL version for DBMail

2005-09-28 Thread Robert Claeson
On 28 sep 2005, at 22.57, Eric Soroos wrote: Since there are only a couple of forward incompatible changes in postgres and many administration and performance improvements, there's very little reason not to be running one of the last couple stable versions 7.4 or 8.0. I'm running Postgre