Colin Manning wrote:
> Thank you Paul for all your time and knowledge.
Glad I could help.
> Was it the fact that I did not run the 2.0 to 2.1 migration script the
> first time?
That's possible, but I only wrote that one after your problems surfaced.
--
__
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Colin Manning wrote:
> O.K.
>
> I have been over this many many times. The data looks good in the database.
> If I telnet to the server and
> a login name pass
> a select inbox
> a fetch 1
That doesn't make any sense at all!
a fetch 1
should return:
Colin Manning wrote:
> O.K.
>
> I have been over this many many times. The data looks good in the database.
> If I telnet to the server and
> a login name pass
> a select inbox
> a fetch 1
That doesn't make any sense at all!
a fetch 1
should return:
a BAD missing argument(s) to FETCH
A typo o
O.K.
I have been over this many many times. The data looks good in the database.
If I telnet to the server and
a login name pass
a select inbox
a fetch 1
I get the message - body and all.
However, If I do this from a mail client (evolution, thunderbird, outlook) I
get nothing.
Sigh.
Colin Manning wrote:
> The first entry returns a blank message, the second one returns a
> garbled message (binary) - e.g.
>
> \ ˆP ¨.½0P ˜’g p;¼p;¼X�Ë¿°ü[
Colin,
It just dawned on me. There was one change in the postgres tables
between 2.0 and 2.1 that is probably significant here:
in db
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail 2.0 to 2.1 upgrade gone bad - no message body
ine-mails
How about this entry:
Apr 6 05:40:19 mail dbmail/imap4d[14577]: COMMAND: [267 UID fetch 42269
(UID RF
How about this entry:
Apr 6 05:40:19 mail dbmail/imap4d[14577]: COMMAND: [267 UID fetch 42269 (UID
RFC822.SIZE BODY[])]
Apr 6 05:40:19 mail dbmail/imap4d[14577]: arg[0]: 'fetch'
Apr 6 05:40:19 mail dbmail/imap4d[14577]: arg[1]: '42269'
Apr 6 05:40:19 mail dbmail/imap4d[14577]: arg[2]: '('
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Colin Manning wrote:
> O.K. The good news is that you know what the problem is
No I don't... sorry.
Bother.
>
> Here is an extract from my maillog when I create a new IMAP client and
> try to get all my old messages...
Again, this looks valid to m
Colin Manning wrote:
> O.K. The good news is that you know what the problem is
No I don't... sorry.
>
> Here is an extract from my maillog when I create a new IMAP client and
> try to get all my old messages...
Again, this looks valid to me.
> Apr 5 15:35:18 mail dbmail/imap4d[30732]: Fet
O.K. The good news is that you know what the problem is
Here is an extract from my maillog when I create a new IMAP client and try to
get all my old messages...
Apr 5 15:35:18 mail dbmail/imap4d[30732]: Fetching msgID 41961 (fetch num
41962)
Apr 5 15:35:18 mail dbmail/imap4d[30732]: db
Colin Manning wrote:
>
>
> And the log for IMAP 2.0.10:
where the last line for the imapd process reads:
> Apr 5 06:35:53 mail dbmail/imap4d[27538]: mime_readheader(): entering
> mime loop
which indicates the 2.0.10 mime parser chokes on this message.
--
_
This 2.1 log looks fine to me.
Colin Manning wrote:
> But wait - there's more!
>
> When I revert back to 2.0.6 executables th mail gets delivered
> correctly!! - I just can't accesses from my client untill I revert to
> the SVN executables.
>
> */Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
>
>
Colin Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 08:39:39 +1000
(EST)
From: Colin Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail 2.0 to 2.1 upgrade gone bad - no message body in
e-mails
To: DBMail mailinglist
And the log for IMAP 2.0.10:
Apr 5 0
And the log for IMAP 2.0.10:
Apr 5 06:21:22 mail dbmail/imap4d[27395]: pool.c,child_register: register
child [27395]
Apr 5 06:21:22 mail dbmail/imap4d[27395]: pool.c,child_register: initializing
child_state [27395] using slot [0]
Apr 5 06:21:22 mail dbmail/imap4d[27397]: pool.c,child_
But wait - there's more!
When I revert back to 2.0.6 executables th mail gets delivered correctly!! - I
just can't accesses from my client untill I revert to the SVN executables.
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Colin Manning wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been running dbmail for some
Colin Manning wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been running dbmail for some time now, and waiting for seive -
> thanks to everyone involved in getting it going.
>
> So I thought that today would be a good day to install 2.1.5 - after
> finally getting it to compile.
>
> So, understanding that it is
Jesse Norell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The format of saved messages is different for 2.1, so all new mail
> would need to be saved in the new format. If you use pop3, not imap,
> you should be able to run the 2.0 pop3 daemon and the 2.1 injector
> (dbmail-lmtpd or dbmail-inject) and be fine while d
kost wrote:
> Здравствуйте!
indeed :-\
> Is there any sql queries that lock mysql tables in 'dbmail-util -ay'
> command? For example 'OPTIMIZE TABLE'...
Yes. If you want to avoid that (makes sense) use 'dbmail-util -by'
--
kost wrote:
> PJS> kost wrote:
>
>>>Hi All!
>>>
>>>Currently I'm using dbmail 2.0.7 version. In near feature (I hope
>>>after dbmail 2.1.4 release) I'm going to migrate on 2.1.x branch.
>>>But I didn't find any docs about migration from 2.0 to 2.1
>>>
>>>Shall it enough if I just add new tables
kost wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> Currently I'm using dbmail 2.0.7 version. In near feature (I hope
> after dbmail 2.1.4 release) I'm going to migrate on 2.1.x branch.
> But I didn't find any docs about migration from 2.0 to 2.1
>
> Shall it enough if I just add new tables from create_tables_innoDB.mys
dbmail wrote:
The NCHILDREN will result one more processes
for example: NCHILDREN=2
root 4836 0.0 0.4 2364 796 ?S12:22 0:00 dbmail-imapd
nobody4837 0.0 0.4 2364 820 ?S12:22 0:00 dbmail-imapd
nobody4838 0.0 0.7 2496 1340 ?S12:22
Hello,
> I have tested dbmail.(MTA postfix) on Suse 9.1 (for test on vmware)
>
> If using myisam tables check should be added like
> SELECT *
> FROM dbmail_messages
> LEFT JOIN dbmail_physmessage ON dbmail_messages.physmessage_id =
> dbmail_physmessage.id
> WHERE dbmail_physmessage.id IS NU
Hey Sumbry and List:
If you still have orphaned messages I offer a solution.
DBMA will find and mark orphaned messages for deletion.
(DBMA V2.1.2)
http://library.mobrien.com/dbmailadministrator/
Untar it. Open in browser.
Configure from the GUI.
Select "Update Delete Status" checkbox and press "
> orphaned messageblks is exactly the sort of stuff dbmail-util is supposed to
> look for.
>
> if dbmail-util -r doesn't clean out those blks, we have a bug.
I pointed this out on dbmail-dev a little while ago as I had the same
problem. dbmail-util doesn't yet fix these.
select count(*) from dbm
> John,
>
> orphaned messageblks is exactly the sort of stuff dbmail-util
> is supposed to look for.
>
> if dbmail-util -r doesn't clean out those blks, we have a bug.
>
It did not... :(
Note however, that all these orphaned messages are from deleted
mailboxes.
... john
anley
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:11 PM
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] DBMail 2.0 final
This worked for me!
cat $USER.mbx | formail -e -f -s
/opt/dbmail2/sbin/dbmail-smtp -u $USER
Course you need to install formail.
Doug
p.s. those are the flags that I used to properly
John,
orphaned messageblks is exactly the sort of stuff dbmail-util is supposed to
look for.
if dbmail-util -r doesn't clean out those blks, we have a bug.
John Hansen wrote:
Weren't there going to be a cleanup tool to get rid of old messages no
longer linked from any mailbox?
I did some
Heh, other way around Create mbox files from a dbmail account...
... John
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Stanley
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:11 PM
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [
This worked for me!
cat $USER.mbx | formail -e -f -s /opt/dbmail2/sbin/dbmail-smtp -u $USER
Course you need to install formail.
Doug
p.s. those are the flags that I used to properly parse whatever weirdo
format mailboxes SLmail uses. I beleive their mbx...You might need
different flags...I'd s
M. J. [Mike] O'Brien wrote:
http://library.mobrien.com/dbmailadministrator
Thanks Mike...
got the ini scripts running as well.
next is SMTP Auth & I'm rocking.
back to the List Archives
Alex
http://library.mobrien.com/dbmailadministrator/
> Next questions:
>
> - What is every one using as a Wev Frontend for DBmail 2 - only found
> one for an older version. Will this work well with 2.0?
> - Have been looking for RedHat compatible init scripts. Haven't found
> any (yet) - anybody go
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Alex Broens wrote:
Oct 16 11:22:16 mail dbmail/maintenance[3433]: dbmysql.c,db_connect:
mysql_real_connect failed: Can't connect to local MySQL server through
socket ' /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (2)
Alex, remove those spaces right after the = sign in the config.
use:
Alex Broens wrote:
Oct 16 11:22:16 mail dbmail/maintenance[3433]: dbmysql.c,db_connect:
mysql_real_connect failed: Can't connect to local MySQL server through
socket ' /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (2)
Alex, remove those spaces right after the = sign in the config.
use:
socket=/var/lib/mysql/mys
conecting to a db on another machine didn't work either.
should I give up or hope someone from the dev team comes up with THE
solution?
Alex
On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 17:40, Alex Broens wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, Peter
>
> nothing is chrooted (till it works .-)
>
> using socket or not its s
Thanks for your reply, Peter
nothing is chrooted (till it works .-)
using socket or not its still not working:
connect failed: Unknown MySQL Server Host ' 192.168.192.181' (1)
connect failed: Unknown MySQL Server Host ' localhost' (1)
any other tool can connect to the DB, only DBMAIL can't.
L
The same happens to me with 3500 messages.
I really think this is related to caching in squirrelmail, but I didn't
look at the code, so I can not confirm this.
[]s, gandhi
Richard Houston wrote:
Hi all,
I have a brand new dbmail 2.0 RC8 install using Fedora Core 2 and Mysql
4.0.20.
Everyth
James XMS wrote:
Hi All,
I know i am probably going to get flamed for this, and get responses like 'how long is a bit of string', but does anybody have an e.t.a for DBMail 2.0 Final? Or can anybody say whether
rc4 is the final release candidate before the final?
I am just anxious because i a
The framework is in place, but the code is mostly stubs. Sieve support
is scheduled for 2.1.
Guido wrote:
On Friday 19 March 2004 17:57, Ilja Booij wrote:
DBMail 2.0 Release Candidate 4 can be downloaded from the download page
at http://www.dbmail.org. These bugs were fixed:
We could pr
Has anyone else had a chance to test the new changes? I recompiled the
binaries with the pipe.c changes and the maximum file size is still 512K.
- Original Message -
From: "Ilja Booij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 6:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail
Hi,
Thanks for this fix!
I've made a small additional change. Because the while-loop now also
continues if linemem != 0, I've added a statement to set linemem = 0 if
the end of the message (.\r\n as one line) is reached.
Ilja
all changes to pipe.c:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dbmail2_0$ cvs diff pi
Thanks Booil for your reply,
Like i said im not shure if im right or wrong
about the curmail_size in dbmail 2.0.
Im migrating from uwimap to dbmail.
I plan to use HORDE/IMP as webmail.
I had some mysql code in IMP that give me the space use in the
users mail box under dbmail 1.2.3.
Since dbm
Hi,
Jacques, can you give examples of situations in which it does not
calculate the size? (possibly with a trace log)
Ilja
Jacques Beaudoin wrote:
Im not shure of this but curmail_size in the user table
does not seam to calculate the actual size of a uses mailboxes.
Thanks
Jacques Beaudoi
42 matches
Mail list logo
